Energy Banking: A&D-VP or IBD-Classic Associate More Attractive?

Couldn't find the comparison on the forum, so thought I'd throw this out there.

-

I naturally filter into VP A&D or IBD-Classic Associate roles (bio below). I'd planned to go the route of VP A&D for my next role... but now I'm getting conflicting views that some of the A&D technical guys are "2nd class" at most shops (bonus, exits, client-interactions).

Would love to hear your thoughts on if a drop down to Associate is worth the trouble.

-

Background: 10-year Reservoir Engineer (on the E&P side). Even mix of Capital projects and A&D/Corp-Dev (worked two of the more recent 10-figure public deals). Hold CFA and MBA.

8 Comments
 

To me, it seems you enjoy and plan to stay on the upstream side of energy and your experience will be a value add - it would make more sense to take the A&D position in my opinion.

I would only take the "IBD-Classic Associate roles" if you plan on transitioning into something different and didn't want to do E&P anymore (or don't plan to anymore). Are these Associate roles for a Generalist program or in a different sector or would you still be in energy?

 
Most Helpful

Depends on the shop. Some like to lean into technical prowess for evaluations and to win assignments. So you'd be client facing and a major element of the team. Others, maybe you're just cranking appendix slides, updating reserve reports on different price decks and making play maps. Better upstream advisors, in my opinion, are more integrated and most of the strong shops are moving that way or already have. Do what you honestly enjoy more. If you want to stay in upstream energy I'd lean A&D and learn the rest as you go.

 

Thanks for the thoughts! It looks like I'm getting mixed feedback. I imagine this is a reflection of differing structures across the shops.

If you don't mind me asking, what shops might you suggest where A&D technical guys are treated as of "similar class"? (integrated teams, client facing, comp, etc.)

I've heard decent stuff about Jeffries and Evercore in this respect... and I've heard poor stuff about Goldman.

 

I’d say the more boutique / energy focused banks will treat you as an “equal”. Having said that, being an engineering background myself, I’m biased that you’re always valuable to any upstream banking team.

The worst shops for “equality” tend to be satellite offices where they feel they need the reserve report guy just to add PDP at Strip on a comps slide for a pitch they’ll never win.

 

Comp, exits, and job security will be higher in classic, even factoring in the drop to associate (what year associate btw? 3rd year is a lot different than associate 0). Seems like A&D teams get cut en masse when there's a change up top. Definitely agree that the A&D teams are viewed as "second-class", which is kind of ironic given how integral they are to deal process.

IMO unless you love the engineering/A&D side of things, think IBD is the way to go.  If you ever want out of O&G you can make the switch internally, and if not then you'll just be a top bucket associate for knowing the technical side so well.

 

Thanks for the feedback! I've quite enjoyed Engineering. However, I am certainly intrigued by the more finance-focused roles (where I get to eventually own the client interaction and build the pro-forma models).

It's a relatively high regret cost jumping into classic/coverage as an A0. And the idea of being junior to guys 5-years younger is a bit embarrassing. 

Nonetheless, it seems like I may need to stomach my pride and go for it (?)

 

On the bright side, you will be a top bucket A0 with so much industry knowledge, and being in that type of training program sets you up to learn. If they threw you in at A2 or A3 you would be materially behind your peers in M&A skills, modeling, etc and would likely struggle all the way up to VP and beyond

There are associates in their 40s on the street... you are never too old!

 

Pariatur repellendus dolor animi. Laudantium est voluptate et est dolores et. Dolorum inventore incidunt iste reprehenderit sunt minus quisquam. Dolor rerum sed quis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (47) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (74) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”