If company A buys 70% of shares of company B at $10/share. Company B has EBITDA of 20 and a total of shares outstanding of 50, and a FDSO of 80. Company B has debt of 30. What is the EV/EBITDA multiple in this acquisition? Will EV/EBITDA differ if company A decides to assume the debt or do a debt-free deal?
| +197 | Americas M&A League Table Q2 Updated | 77 | 1d |
| +142 | New Article: Dramatic Slide as UBS #22 (US) & New Leadership Desperately Needed | 38 | 7h |
| +131 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 34 | 1d |
| +97 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 46 | 6h |
| +86 | Woman who emptied Knicks trashcan on street then stole it was DEI exec, worked at JPMorgan Chase | 22 | 9h |
| +71 | Stop sleeping on UBS - it’s pretty good | 24 | 2h |
| +51 | 2026 VAULT PRESTIGE RANKINGS | 29 | 11h |
| +39 | AI + Financial Modelling | 12 | 8h |
| +28 | Summer before college | 15 | 6h |
| +27 | Hardest interview experiences? | 16 | 6h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Should a listed company ever acquire a company for an EV/EBITDA multiple that is higher than it's own EV/EBITDAtrading multiple? (Originally Posted: 07/14/2015)
For example, company A is publicly listed and is valued at 7x EBITDA. It acquires company B, which is a private company in the exact same business, for 9x EBITDA. What should I consider in assessing whether this is makes sense or not?
If Company B is "better" (higher margins, faster growth potential, etc.), it should deserve a higher multiple than Company A.
Sure, I understand that. The question is really about what shareholders of company A should think of as they evaluate this transaction. Will it (ceterus paribus) likely improve company A's EV/EBITDA multiple? Or will integrating company B into A decrease the value of company B as it's now possibly facing the same economic reality/inefficiencies as company A? In this case, management of company A destroyed value by paying more than it's own multiple for company B. Of course, everything depends on the specific case, but I'm looking for general considerations when evaluating such a transaction from the POV of company A shareholders. Thanks
Assuming the two companies are in the same industry, adopting best practices from Company B could allow Company AB to achieve the same multiple that B standalone had (or higher given synergies).
Synergies and growth potential of the target are just two reasons to do so.
Uh, two words: operating leverage
Dolore ducimus non nobis atque in repellendus eos. Ipsa tempore placeat aut aut voluptas aspernatur incidunt.
Qui et incidunt minus dolores et molestiae. Ad iure et fugiat voluptatum rerum blanditiis minima. Reiciendis dolores officia autem sit nobis. Veritatis et magni ex velit id in. Expedita sed fugiat magni asperiores.
Laudantium provident animi aperiam expedita corporis. Illo excepturi praesentium tempora distinctio. Dolores deleniti et beatae quam fuga. Quia provident aliquid nisi blanditiis aperiam. Est enim quod libero in. Sed voluptate iste non assumenda et voluptatum. Consequatur nesciunt a nesciunt tenetur.
Accusamus et deserunt esse cumque voluptates. Ullam unde nihil quibusdam est et. Hic consequatur et necessitatibus accusantium ut officia delectus. Dolores modi blanditiis quidem velit rem et. Nostrum tempore ad id quis occaecati.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...