FT Partners (Off-cycle) or Oliver Wyman (Full-time)?

I've received offers for the roles above at FT Partners and Oliver Wyman. My goal is PE, and I have previous intern experience at a MM PE/GE fund. I have seen on LinkedIn and spoken to consultants at OW that exits into PE are possible, especially into firms such as Apax and in UMM/MM. At OW, I would do PIPE (PE) work.

However, I'm currently wondering if I should renege/leave OW early so that I can do an off-cycle at FT Partners. I've read that FTP doesn't have great exits directly into PE, and there isn't the job security of a full-time role given it's an off-cycle (though they say there is an opportunity to convert to an analyst after 6 months). I'm quite indifferent between the work in consulting and IBD. I have also recruited into MBB previously, and a move there in the near future may also be possible. However, I understand that IBD is a good/better way to break into PE than consulting, and there is a possibility to lateral to an IB firm with better exits (and one that doesn't get shit on so much on WSO).

Let me know what you all think I should do, would appreciate any insight/stories/lived experiences!