GS Public Sector & Infra or BofA / Gugg M&A
If someone had an option between top BB public sector and middle BB M&A what
If someone had an option between top BB public sector and middle BB M&A what
| +273 | Earliest you can get fired | 58 | 1d |
| +258 | Investment Banking is Divine | 40 | 1d |
| +219 | Another $115bn Mega deal for these banks. Congrats! | 45 | 1d |
| +216 | US 2027 SA IB worried about background check | 53 | 1d |
| +206 | Analyst: Why is UBS IB doing worse than peers?, UBS CFO: No Comment | 41 | 2d |
| +206 | Leaked Interview Questions to Recruiting Services | 61 | 2d |
| +138 | Is UBS really that bad? | 39 | 4h |
| +40 | Is Houston SA 28 recruiting already over? | 34 | 22h |
| +27 | FIG Pigeonholes you - is it true? | 8 | 1d |
| +27 | 2026-27 IB Energy Top Banks | 8 | 1d |
Career Resources
You would be stupid to take GS PSI over BofA M&A
.
.
What part of public finance interests you? It's a shrinking/low fee industry and the modeling is less transferable to all the traditional exits. If it's infra/infra PE you're more interested in, I think you'll have a better shot coming from an M&A background.
But if you want to be a treasurer/CFO of a city/university/transit system, it wouldn't be a bad path. Base street pay and hours are better.
Interesting
Okay
would say that bofa m&a will probably set you up better for credit roles than PSI if you want to do anything sub-IG. muni bonds are not exactly the same as PC and M&A is a great starting point for learning early on in your career. PSI is not really seen as a classics group at goldman, it sits with capital solutions.
That being said GS PSI does do more complex deals than other banks with larger balance sheets like JPM/Citi and infra is shaping out to be pretty interesting this next couple of years. If you're passionate about the role take GS, but if you are undecided in what you want in the future, M&A gives you the most flexibility in what you can transition to.
del
PSI at GS is looked down on as a second-tier group / does not get same respect. There might be one partner, max. I think they pay less than Classic too, despite working just as hard. Would highly recommend not doing this. It's even nicher than doing a specialized sector group like FIG or O&G.
Source: worked at GS for 4 years (not in PSI).
This is correct and they have 0 partners (even the group head)
does Psi feeds into Infra pe
See my comment in the Q&A Public Finance at a BB thread. Do yourself a favor and take BAML M&A. GS pub fin outcomes are good for pub fin but BAML M&A is much better. Don’t fool yourself into thinking your college love for public policy will make you find issuing municipal bonds interesting. The kids with this mentality spend a year there then aggressively try to leave and realize their exits are compromised relative to M&A.
Couldn’t also switch internally if I didn’t like it to CSG groups?
Wow, you really fucked it.
How
Do they work less hours?
bump
did u end up getting ur offer already
hypo
bump
did you end up getting ur offer already as well
hypo
Nobis vitae aliquam facere nulla velit. Rerum aperiam repellat et qui provident veniam quo. Non dolore optio debitis sed suscipit. Voluptatem nesciunt sed laboriosam accusamus.
Molestiae ab rerum voluptatibus. Et illum adipisci exercitationem quo non laudantium distinctio.
Minima dolorem nisi rerum debitis repellendus ipsa. Similique consectetur odit aut et architecto aut tenetur qui. Laborum animi ratione voluptatibus quaerat minima quas. Vero laboriosam molestiae soluta delectus provident voluptatum deserunt. Impedit et voluptas vitae at aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Sequi velit ea repudiandae assumenda at pariatur. Maiores cupiditate sunt dolor est sit porro perferendis. Cumque adipisci provident velit et numquam.
Corrupti animi iure ipsam ducimus aut. Consectetur non distinctio aperiam nemo. Iste voluptatum et quia iure placeat cupiditate. Cupiditate aut dolorem est consequatur.
Voluptatem aspernatur hic provident provident veniam aspernatur. Consequatur occaecati quasi error sunt doloribus iure ut.