15 Comments
 
Best Response

This question isn't a test that requires a ton of critical thinking, its more-so of a gauge to see whether or not you understand how financial statements and a DCF analysis work conceptually. Memorizing an answer that WSO gives you isn't going to help your case, especially if they follow up with questions to your answer. To answer this question on an interview, talk about how revenue flows down the income statement to your calculation of FCF, and the purpose of calculating cash flows in a DCF analysis and the implications a 10% change in your top line.

 

Another important thing to keep in mind is what impacts the DCF the most. I got this revenue question in one interview, and it was then followed up by "What would have the greatest impact on the DCF: a 5% change in revenue or a 5% change in terminal value?" Just remember that changes to WACC (or whatever your discount rate is) and terminal value are what impact the DCF the most.

 

So I understand that a 10% change in rev might affect the dcf more than a 1% change in the discount rate (b/c a change in rev flows through ebitda, the fcf's, future fcf's and even the terminal value). But why is it that a 5% change in terminal value would affect the dcf more than a 5% change in revenue? Is it because you're discounting back all those years by that discount rate which just by definition would have a greater impact? Probably cause I'm a beginner but I'm not really seeing the math..

 
"bankertobe27"

So I understand that a 10% change in rev might affect the dcf more than a 1% change in the discount rate (b/c a change in rev flows through ebitda, the fcf's, future fcf's and even the terminal value). But why is it that a 5% change in terminal value would affect the dcf more than a 5% change in revenue? Is it because you're discounting back all those years by that discount rate which just by definition would have a greater impact? Probably cause I'm a beginner but I'm not really seeing the math..

The 10% change in revenue affects a much smaller number of cash flows than the terminal value does. In theory, the terminal value affects the entire period after year five in the DCF, while the growth rate has a small effect on the terminal value (if you used Gordon's Growth Method) and a fairly large one on the five years of projections. I hope that helps.

 

Hi, I have a follow up question on this issue. So just to clarify, is it right to order the factors affecting DCF valuation from greatest to least as follows: 1. Discount rate 2. Terminal value 3. Revenue

Just wanted to clarify because some sources like StreetOfWalls says that "FCF (and Terminal Value, which uses FCF as an input)" is the factor affecting the most.

Also, I don't quite understand what you mean when you say that growth rate has a small effect on the terminal value whereas it has a fairly large effect on the 5 year of projections - I was under the impression that terminal value is significantly affected by the terminal growth rate, since you're effectively assuming that as a constant perpetual growth rate forever into the future...?

 

The company will have revenue someday. You probability weight the expenses associated with achieving revenue and then take the present value of the revenue generated by investments today.

 

DCF built far into future (biotech) when company actually starts to generate revenue, otherwise there any point in building DCF as you will get negative value

 

Vitae voluptas nesciunt qui temporibus et quia. Ut quo qui amet ratione illo id. Officia quod a quidem voluptas.

Aut alias et quas et voluptas. Accusamus accusantium excepturi nam impedit maiores voluptates quia. Quia culpa ullam eos vero cumque.

Voluptas ratione sint sunt iure. Quidem quis in non corrupti sit libero saepe. Sequi est dolorum iure molestiae dolorem repudiandae cum blanditiis. Quia natus in magni aut sunt.

Optio deserunt consequatur et molestias consequatur nam ducimus. Atque quam deleniti ut quas laboriosam aut. Quis dolor unde aperiam eos deleniti aut rerum dolorem. Veritatis quia ipsa sit et magnam dicta.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”