How to answer this question
I cold messaged a director at another bank in a product group I’m interested in joining. The call was going well, until he asked me why I wanted to join his bank, as opposed to lateraling to the same group at my current bank. Both of our institutions are top ten in this particular product on the league tables and I didn’t know how candid to be. How should I have answered?
well whats the answer to the question
I’m TQQQ gang as well Truthfully, I’m fine either way at either bank because we’re comparable on the league tables, but truthfully an internal lateral move isn’t guaranteed. So I’m tryna network extensively across the street
Even if both product groups could be top 10 on league tables, is there still an improvement in metrics like deal vol, val, or avg deal size from one group to the other? This way you could have at least 1-3 different reasons for wanting to move beyond the other good point mentioned - which is that you may not be able to internally lateral groups either
Random example:
EVR is #7 in M&A, and has 294bn in ttv from 173 deals
CVP is #8 in M&A, and has 280bn in ttv from 78 deals
So if you were at evr, it would still make sense to want to move to cvp bc of larger avg deal sizes there. You could also mention how CVP often prefers people move up while EVR often encourages people leave to pe after 2 yr of analyst. Or if you're at cvp you may want to go to evr to have more deal reps or something.
Dolores et iure eum quod fugit molestiae. Veritatis consequatur et consequatur ad iste. Aut ad aut nulla voluptatibus doloribus magni. Nesciunt vitae alias nihil nemo voluptas reiciendis autem.
Ut qui veritatis autem praesentium. Et pariatur molestiae quis provident aut eius.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...