Got this question on my superday: how to value a company with negative beta? Totally bs my answer during the interview, would like to know the right explanation to this question.
| +121 | AI Creating More Work | 38 | 6h |
| +116 | Is it Bad That I ALREADY Don’t Care? | 32 | 20h |
| +107 | Senior Banker's Guide to IB Recruiting / Group Placement (with a Healthcare Bent) | 16 | 5h |
| +106 | Shit PWP Culture | 79 | 1h |
| +85 | Is pay at BofA really that bad? | 33 | 1h |
| +49 | How easy was recruiting for you? | 26 | 1h |
| +40 | Is the life of a VP at a 'top-bank' really good? | 15 | 1h |
| +38 | 22yo IB Analyst just had mental health breakdown | 12 | 8h |
| +29 | Law school instead of MBA for RX Banking | 5 | 7h |
| +24 | No BB RO 2026 | 6 | 3h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Not a seasoned pro here, but my first thought when given this question would be to explain the definition of beta.
Loosely speaking, a company's beta is a reflection of the volatility of its return with respect to the market, depending on the magnitude of the beta, a negative beta means that for every basis point the market index gains, the company would lose an x amount.
Off the top of my head, this would mean that perhaps market-based valuation methods would be slightly inappropriate. Of course, this is assuming that your peers are not of negative beta as well (which in any case, I believe is uncommon, but I agree that there are points for contention given that companies in similar industries should have similar returns etc.).
With this in mind, it would be better to use intrinsic valuation methods such as DCF which is not market dependent, which is what beta is essentially. Problem for this is when it comes to the calculation of the cost of equity component of WACC, it might bring up slightly unorthodox numbers but I believe it would still be somewhat sensible.
Happy to hear other thoughts or be corrected if I'm wrong.
Two approaches I can think of 1) take a different time scale and see if it's a different result. If you are using two or three year weekly beta try one year or five year.
If that doesn't work move to step 2) find the asset beta of comparables by unlevering betas using the capital structure. Relever the median or average asset beta to the target capital structure and proceed as normal.
Agreed with approach, though I was thinking of answer from a different point of view
Assumenda autem autem voluptatem voluptatum incidunt molestiae explicabo. In soluta dolorum quo rerum. Molestiae aut et reiciendis.
Repudiandae laboriosam molestiae magni est maiores quasi error officiis. Voluptate minima dicta quod et libero. Quo cupiditate culpa fuga soluta ut dolor.
Minus in rerum nostrum delectus vel accusantium. Nemo unde non quod dolorem. Molestias laboriosam quia sint. Eos sunt esse sunt eum ut doloribus.
Libero voluptatem nihil qui esse aut voluptatem dolorem. Quas sed architecto debitis est. Consequatur pariatur quia quod quis amet rerum. Sint voluptatem sint optio est. In magnam facilis voluptas possimus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...