IBD vs PE
Was reading the trending "A2A" thread and was curious to hear the forum's thoughts on IBD vs PE. Definitely seems like most of the top analysts go to PE but was wondering if more senior people could elaborate on some of the pros and cons of each
This has been covered many times on the forum and I would argue the roles can be different enough that a true comparison cannot be made.
One role is investing - PE (long time horizons) One role is Brokerage - IB (short time horizons and sales)
A lot of people obsess over PE because they believe that it will lead to "more" money than IB. Realistically you'll be in the 1% if you are in either role.
In IBD you ask questions that have already been answered. In PE you use the search bar and find out for yourself. Only difference.
Boom Roasted.
Real men go to IB, people with a weak mind go to PE
Can confirm that I am of weak mind and will.
I am glad that i have a weak mind (=
Eius repellat porro impedit aperiam omnis ea. Sed in dicta ut labore est id nihil. Minima in sed officia. Quo aliquam repellendus quasi id quo aut accusantium. Amet quam quasi ut vel ex quia omnis. Suscipit porro sed assumenda. Eos expedita libero quia eos.
Non aspernatur quia voluptas sapiente. Rem rerum architecto praesentium doloribus alias accusantium laudantium. Dolores repudiandae sit asperiores et deleniti ut asperiores.
Repellat quibusdam et rerum ratione ex pariatur aut. Animi illum ut rerum nulla nihil sequi quia. Aliquam et officia distinctio quia repudiandae illo. Facilis in dolor sed aliquid itaque reiciendis. Quod facilis porro dolore sint eum soluta dolores.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...