A portfolio manager announces that the average of the returns realized in each year of the last 10 years is 20% per annum. In what respect is this statement misleading?
From my derivative math class.
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +149 | Return Rates For Interns Are Falling? | 46 | 1h |
| +127 | UBS Americas IB: The Kids’ Table of Wall Street | 16 | 2h |
| +84 | I am a drunk MD AMA | 35 | 2h |
| +73 | London IB BB is a challenge | 40 | 9h |
| +61 | VP Lifestyle at Top BB Coverage Groups | 39 | 7h |
| +52 | An Outsider’s View of RX Banking Out of College | 6 | 1d |
| +51 | One year since I didn't get a return - advice | 2 | 3h |
| +48 | SharePoint makes IB hours HELL | 15 | 2d |
| +42 | momentum of Rx groups | 15 | 10h |
| +39 | Fired during interview | 8 | 15h |
Career Resources
Because average returns don't reflect compounding.
Consider a Portfolio worth $100 that is worth $300 after year one and stays at that number for 10 years. Or, consider a portfolio that makes you 20% every year.
Both have average returns of 20%, one portfolio is worth a whole lot more after 10 years.
CAGR would be the true story teller...
(Ending Value/Beginning Value^1/No. of years) subracted from 1.
have to love that CAGR
Et voluptatem ut totam id magni est atque explicabo. Quo corporis suscipit voluptatibus iusto et alias. Error inventore officia commodi illo nam. Voluptate et possimus debitis eum minima et. Dolorem error optio consectetur sapiente officia quod fugit. Quis incidunt est et aut earum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...