I will set you up with some ufc picks for an internship. Daddy lives in Greenwich CT and says I need an internship next summer. Seems like a fair deal. Success rate: 97% Need something in NYC >300k because I need some more chrome. Will be at Phebes if you want to network. Message me if you want to network.
BW Chama or no Chama
| +130 | New Article: Dramatic Slide as UBS #22 (US) & New Leadership Desperately Needed | 25 | 5h |
| +102 | Americas M&A League Table Q2 Updated | 49 | 6m |
| +73 | Wealthy Parents / Jaded | 24 | 1d |
| +58 | How are hours rn for SA (interns) | 31 | 20h |
| +54 | A COMPLETE GUIDE TO SUMMER INTERNSHIP RECRUITING | 11 | 19h |
| +49 | Venezuela Debt Restructuring - LAZ vs CVP | 22 | 1d |
| +42 | Boutique firm wants access to my LinkedIn? | 34 | 17h |
| +33 | Investment Banking in Mexico | 9 | 21h |
| +28 | MM bottom bucket bonus | 9 | 4d |
| +26 | Investment Banking is Hard | 11 | 15m |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Thoughts on tn Pereira v prochazka?
Daddy was playing poker with Dana, Pereira was an easy pick. Jiri was too weak to fight him. Pereira was too heavy and easy. Let me know if you want 304 pick will sadly take accounting internships. KPMG not preferred!
I work at a quant firm not sure if your qualified tbh
I am a dedicated UFC viewer, idc that your a nerdy quant, views will not stand a chance against my picks, I have an algo with a 97% rate. Achieving a 97% success rate in sports gambling requires placing a substantial number of bets, such as ( N = 1000 ), with ( W = 970 ) wins. The expected value (EV) of each bet must be positive, calculated as ( EV = P \times \text{Profit} - (1 - P) \times \text{Loss} ), where ( P = 0.97 ). To confirm this rate is not due to random variance, statistical significance can be tested using a hypothesis test (e.g., a z-test or chi-squared test), ensuring the observed success rate significantly exceeds the expected rate under a null hypothesis of randomness.
Works at a quant firm but doesn’t know the difference between your and you’re
Est illum praesentium quidem expedita sequi quos et. Provident expedita adipisci inventore aut voluptatum. Ipsum dolor doloribus quis inventore. Qui aut sapiente asperiores aut laborum. Aliquam voluptatibus dolores dolores necessitatibus.
Et sit animi molestiae autem ad dolorem et. Corrupti odio rem error. Recusandae totam delectus numquam harum sed ut nihil. Excepturi et quis ullam vitae ea.
Dignissimos iure omnis totam blanditiis. Architecto maiores consequuntur molestiae neque cum tempore harum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...