I will set you up with some ufc picks for an internship. Daddy lives in Greenwich CT and says I need an internship next summer. Seems like a fair deal. Success rate: 97% Need something in NYC >300k because I need some more chrome. Will be at Phebes if you want to network. Message me if you want to network.
BW Chama or no Chama
| +278 | Return Rates For Interns Are Falling? | 113 | 1m |
| +123 | Article: Why UBS's Asian M&A bankers are thriving and UBS's American M&A bankers are not | 13 | 1h |
| +114 | I am a drunk MD AMA | 39 | 1d |
| +73 | UBS Offer Day | 27 | 3h |
| +64 | VP Lifestyle at Top BB Coverage Groups | 40 | 2d |
| +57 | An Outsider’s View of RX Banking Out of College | 6 | 5d |
| +46 | No return so what are the options left | 31 | 4h |
| +45 | Evercore > Goldman and I don’t think it’s particularly close anymore | 21 | 6m |
| +41 | WF Return offers | 28 | 2h |
| +41 | I hate Wells Fargo | 7 | 51m |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Thoughts on tn Pereira v prochazka?
Daddy was playing poker with Dana, Pereira was an easy pick. Jiri was too weak to fight him. Pereira was too heavy and easy. Let me know if you want 304 pick will sadly take accounting internships. KPMG not preferred!
I work at a quant firm not sure if your qualified tbh
I am a dedicated UFC viewer, idc that your a nerdy quant, views will not stand a chance against my picks, I have an algo with a 97% rate. Achieving a 97% success rate in sports gambling requires placing a substantial number of bets, such as ( N = 1000 ), with ( W = 970 ) wins. The expected value (EV) of each bet must be positive, calculated as ( EV = P \times \text{Profit} - (1 - P) \times \text{Loss} ), where ( P = 0.97 ). To confirm this rate is not due to random variance, statistical significance can be tested using a hypothesis test (e.g., a z-test or chi-squared test), ensuring the observed success rate significantly exceeds the expected rate under a null hypothesis of randomness.
Works at a quant firm but doesn’t know the difference between your and you’re
Fugiat quia excepturi voluptates iste nostrum. Aut facilis quia quia nobis. Cumque eligendi in eveniet similique repellat sint. Quo quia omnis et nihil non voluptatibus repellat.
Distinctio asperiores accusamus commodi consequatur ratione sequi id. Veniam tenetur voluptatem molestiae hic.
Maxime eveniet natus aliquam rem. Eum hic accusamus voluptas quo. Aut voluptas placeat nobis fugit consectetur et aperiam. Eos et qui iusto exercitationem nostrum voluptas dicta exercitationem. Est ut excepturi ratione laborum in et magni.
Nemo suscipit natus atque culpa. Itaque rem velit aut enim. Et similique delectus doloribus earum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...