I saw this question on an interview review:
"If you had a COE of 20% and a WACC of 15% would you do a LBO with an IRR of 20%?"
Wouldn't it be yes, because if the LBO produces an IRR > 20%, the investment would be value creating? The guy that responded said "No, because it is an equity investment."
| +328 | UBS Tech MD hires Son (from no-name college) as an Intern | 57 | 20h |
| +269 | Evercore Intern Seizure | 38 | 7h |
| +91 | [Official] 2026 IB Analyst Bonus Megathread (with 2025 Consolidated Pay and Perks/Benefits) | 13 | 43m |
| +55 | JPM M&A is Gone??? Purely Coverage Banking??? | 22 | 10h |
| +54 | Is DCM actually underrated ? | 21 | 19h |
| +46 | Are all Tech / TMT groups sweaty? | 33 | 1d |
| +43 | Losing my personality in Banking | 7 | 3h |
| +39 | Am I behind? 31 Year Old Analyst | 9 | 1d |
| +39 | Associate & Above IB exits | 16 | 2d |
| +31 | Incoming IB Analyst: Best Ways to Prepare? | 8 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
To the best of my knowledge, you wouldn't do the LBO because your equity investors require a return of 20% (cost of equity). An LBO is essentially an equity investment for the company and you wouldn't pursue an IRR that is the same as the cost of equity since you would not receive additional value.
Well it would essentially breakeven, would it not? Plus, I don't understand the writer's answer I put in the original post.
But say for the sake of the question the LBO has an IRR of 21%. Would that not be value creating?
Yes it would be breakeven, but it wouldn't add any additional value so why do it? The writer means that you would compare the LBO's IRR to the cost of equity since you're investing equity into the LBO transaction.
Ok gotcha, I think I just misunderstood the writer's explanation/question. It sounds like if an LBO model shows an IRR > COE, then it's a worthwhile investment. If not, then it's not a worthwhile investment.
The interviewer is correct, but if his response to your question is verbatim, it's not well worded. "It" is not just an equity investment. It is an equity and debt investment. The sources of debt capital would gladly make the investment, but the PE fund wouldn't (because as previously stated, it's breakeven...to them).
Sapiente ratione nihil quo est. Excepturi aperiam voluptates et. Fugiat omnis et quo sint qui delectus aut. Culpa aliquid laboriosam blanditiis non omnis.
Natus omnis quia aperiam eos impedit ratione nihil. Ipsa corporis neque quia voluptatem perferendis illo quia. Quaerat autem repellendus sit unde doloribus ipsa. Est consequatur et aut porro sit.
Tempora est doloribus nobis similique quia quo nesciunt. Magnam facilis impedit labore in repellendus quam magni. Quis eius quis nihil sit asperiores sit ut. Expedita assumenda aut sed iusto dolores nemo qui.
Aut sed magnam expedita qui est eius voluptatem praesentium. Ut eum unde dolor nam. Temporibus vel consequatur sit quaerat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...