I saw this question on an interview review:
"If you had a COE of 20% and a WACC of 15% would you do a LBO with an IRR of 20%?"
Wouldn't it be yes, because if the LBO produces an IRR > 20%, the investment would be value creating? The guy that responded said "No, because it is an equity investment."
| +116 | I think I’m logging off after ER visit | 23 | 14h |
| +97 | Article: UBS Quietly Hollowing Out Its Onshore Workforce and Rebuilding the Bank in India | 25 | 6d |
| +94 | Is it Bad That I ALREADY Don’t Care? | 29 | 9m |
| +91 | Senior Banker's Guide to IB Recruiting / Group Placement (with a Healthcare Bent) | 10 | 2h |
| +80 | AI Creating More Work | 27 | 8m |
| +60 | Shit PWP Culture | 41 | 1m |
| +59 | Consulting Son or CorpDev Daughter? | 6 | 4d |
| +44 | How easy was recruiting for you? | 21 | 4d |
| +36 | 22yo IB Analyst just had mental health breakdown | 11 | 1d |
| +26 | How tf do i control a stutter? | 13 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
To the best of my knowledge, you wouldn't do the LBO because your equity investors require a return of 20% (cost of equity). An LBO is essentially an equity investment for the company and you wouldn't pursue an IRR that is the same as the cost of equity since you would not receive additional value.
Well it would essentially breakeven, would it not? Plus, I don't understand the writer's answer I put in the original post.
But say for the sake of the question the LBO has an IRR of 21%. Would that not be value creating?
Yes it would be breakeven, but it wouldn't add any additional value so why do it? The writer means that you would compare the LBO's IRR to the cost of equity since you're investing equity into the LBO transaction.
Ok gotcha, I think I just misunderstood the writer's explanation/question. It sounds like if an LBO model shows an IRR > COE, then it's a worthwhile investment. If not, then it's not a worthwhile investment.
The interviewer is correct, but if his response to your question is verbatim, it's not well worded. "It" is not just an equity investment. It is an equity and debt investment. The sources of debt capital would gladly make the investment, but the PE fund wouldn't (because as previously stated, it's breakeven...to them).
Beatae adipisci consequatur tempore aut rem et. Molestiae voluptates quisquam excepturi adipisci.
Exercitationem dolorum voluptate ad dolor. Et architecto debitis non libero modi debitis. Sunt corrupti beatae qui facere voluptatem. Minima atque sed iusto consequatur aut vitae. Accusantium illo incidunt delectus aperiam voluptate. Minima quia quos culpa.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...