I saw this question on an interview review:
"If you had a COE of 20% and a WACC of 15% would you do a LBO with an IRR of 20%?"
Wouldn't it be yes, because if the LBO produces an IRR > 20%, the investment would be value creating? The guy that responded said "No, because it is an equity investment."
| +134 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 36 | 4h |
| +109 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 51 | 4h |
| +99 | Woman who emptied Knicks trashcan on street then stole it was DEI exec, worked at JPMorgan Chase | 25 | 1h |
| +82 | Stop sleeping on UBS - it’s pretty good | 29 | 41m |
| +56 | 2026 VAULT PRESTIGE RANKINGS | 30 | 1h |
| +55 | Hot take: I’d rather be at Desjardins than UBS for investment banking in 2026 | 10 | 3m |
| +39 | AI + Financial Modelling | 12 | 1d |
| +32 | Hardest interview experiences? | 17 | 21m |
| +28 | Summer before college | 17 | 19h |
| +26 | Current State of UBS in North America | 8 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
To the best of my knowledge, you wouldn't do the LBO because your equity investors require a return of 20% (cost of equity). An LBO is essentially an equity investment for the company and you wouldn't pursue an IRR that is the same as the cost of equity since you would not receive additional value.
Well it would essentially breakeven, would it not? Plus, I don't understand the writer's answer I put in the original post.
But say for the sake of the question the LBO has an IRR of 21%. Would that not be value creating?
Yes it would be breakeven, but it wouldn't add any additional value so why do it? The writer means that you would compare the LBO's IRR to the cost of equity since you're investing equity into the LBO transaction.
Ok gotcha, I think I just misunderstood the writer's explanation/question. It sounds like if an LBO model shows an IRR > COE, then it's a worthwhile investment. If not, then it's not a worthwhile investment.
The interviewer is correct, but if his response to your question is verbatim, it's not well worded. "It" is not just an equity investment. It is an equity and debt investment. The sources of debt capital would gladly make the investment, but the PE fund wouldn't (because as previously stated, it's breakeven...to them).
Accusamus aut dolor iure ut. Molestias quia dolore sit et praesentium libero ut molestiae. Et dolor esse voluptatem consequatur autem occaecati aut non. Qui mollitia corporis fugit assumenda. Architecto nemo fugit odio enim repellat quasi.
A enim numquam cumque voluptate vitae labore. Minus amet omnis et voluptatem dolorem perspiciatis. Aut ex omnis ducimus animi enim.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...