Is Group or Bank More Important for Exit Opps?

How does Capital Markets/FIG at upper BBs and EBs compare to M&A and other top groups at less prestigious banks like lower BBs and MM firms in terms of PE/HF exit opps? I would assume bank name would be more prestigious for business school and for F500 companies outside high finance but input on that is welcomed as well.

17 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Lol @ putting FIG in the same category as ECM/DCM when talking about exit opps

FIG is a coverage group just like any other industry coverage group. Just like an industrials or healthcare banker, you will be doing modeling, decks, comps, etc. Sure, some of the verticals within FIG (like depository institutions, or insurance) will be a different type of modeling/valuation than your standard EV/EBITDA, FCF-centric businesses, but it is still your "traditional" banking nonetheless.

ECM/DCM generally do not place into PE/HF. This is because the nature of the work in ECM/DCM is obviously not as relevant to the work you'll be doing at a PE or HF compared to industry coverage/M&A groups. If you did go into PE from one of those groups, it'd probably be for a similar capital markets-type role.

FIG, on the other hand, will place into PE/HF, particularly at top FIG shops like Goldman. The range of PE/HFs will be a little more limited compared to industrials, but even still I know people who have gone generalist PE from FIG. It might require a step down in terms of size (i.e. lower-tier FIG group at a BB might have to look at MM shops for generalist PE), but absolutely possible.

In terms of what would be better for MBA or F500, I probably am not qualified to answer that. General logic would tend to agree with your thinking, though.

 

It'll be mostly the brand name of the bank rather than the group that will get you the interview, but it's the type of work that you'll be doing that will impress people. If you're trying to position yourself for a boutique, I would aim for either an industry or M&A. Most of these groups are great, but I might put JPM ECM and GS DCM on a lower level simply based on the type of work you'll be doing rather than the group themselves.

--Death, lighter than a feather; duty, heavier than a mountain
 

Thanks for the input.

So in your opinion, would spending my junior summer at GS / MS / JPM in a DCM / ECM role position me better for FT recruiting at an EB versus a place like Citi / UBS / Deustche in an Industry role? Or the other way around?

My goal at the moment is to land a FT position at an EB.

 

Disagree completely. Bank name means nothing if you are in a terrible group. i.e. your JPM / GS choices are not great, and I would take anything else listed over both of them (obviously HC at JPM is top however)

Top Group at lower bank > Low Group at a top bank

Very simple. Don't be a prestige whore and go to GS to DCM there.. You will 100% regret that decision very soon, especially since you have other offers that are top groups at their respective banks (Citi M&A, UBS LF, JPM HC)

 

Reprehenderit impedit quod est sunt ab perferendis inventore mollitia. Aliquid voluptatum voluptatibus enim. Dolor et dicta inventore aut.

Dolorem neque ea rem rerum. Itaque quae nemo id modi atque ut non. Quis beatae at magni assumenda et illum accusantium. Adipisci id qui minus fugit dolores et sunt.

Reprehenderit ut corporis accusantium suscipit occaecati. Ea facere magni veniam veritatis odit eius sint. Delectus in voluptates odio. Autem totam illum nihil velit consequatur illum ad.

Deserunt impedit quod ut voluptatum maxime veritatis. Tenetur quo quia minima quia. Aut quos veniam perferendis voluptas nihil laboriosam et. Distinctio laboriosam nam nesciunt veniam nostrum quas. Cumque dicta excepturi debitis sequi est quaerat et. Ad tenetur ullam qui aliquam eos quas.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”