Is lack of modelling in LMM normal?

At a no-name in London. Deal flow has been great since I joined last year and have had very good exposure.

However, I’m getting increasingly concerned about the lack of modelling here, namely DCFs (LBOs out the question since we only do sell-sides). Forecasts for the next year are very common, but since all of our transactions are on LTM EBITDA multiples (we do research on precedents) the need for forecasts really only come up in DD requests and they don’t feel so in-depth and meaningful. I wanted to open the floor to anyone familiar with the work in the LMM space and find out if this is common and whether or not I should be concerned. Lateraling upstream is on the cards for me after I hit the 1yr mark FYI. Thanks!

4 Comments
 

In the LMM (Lower Middle Market) space, the lack of heavy modeling, such as DCFs or LBOs, is not uncommon. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some insights:

  1. Nature of LMM Transactions:

    • LMM deals often focus on simpler valuation methods like LTM EBITDA multiples and precedent transactions. This is because buyers and sellers in this space prioritize straightforward, market-driven metrics over complex theoretical models.
    • Forecasting and detailed modeling are typically less emphasized unless required for specific due diligence (DD) requests.
  2. Sell-Side Focus:

    • Since your firm primarily handles sell-side transactions, the modeling requirements are naturally lighter. Sell-side processes in the LMM often revolve around preparing marketing materials, managing buyer interactions, and ensuring smooth deal execution rather than building intricate models.
  3. Should You Be Concerned?

    • If your goal is to lateral to a larger firm or move upstream (e.g., MM or BB), the lack of modeling exposure could be a concern. Larger firms often expect strong technical skills, including proficiency in DCFs, LBOs, and other advanced modeling techniques.
    • However, your strong deal flow and exposure to the transaction process are valuable experiences that can still position you well for a move.
  4. Actionable Steps:

    • Self-Study: Consider leveraging resources like WSO's financial modeling courses (e.g., DCF, LBO, and 3-statement modeling) to build your technical skills independently.
    • Networking: Connect with professionals in MM or BB firms to understand their expectations and tailor your preparation accordingly.
    • Highlight Your Strengths: When lateraling, emphasize your deal experience, client interaction, and understanding of the transaction process while addressing any technical gaps proactively.

In summary, the lack of modeling in LMM is typical, but if you're aiming to move upstream, taking proactive steps to enhance your technical skills will be crucial.

Sources: Biotech finance part 2: valuation methodologies and modeling considerations, Lack of diversity in Banking/Finance, Feel Like I Got Conned - Small No-Name Boutique, Biotech finance part 2: valuation methodologies and modeling considerations, Financial modelling on the buyside

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

I'm in the exact same position, and I share your concern.

From what I’ve seen, many trade buyers in the vLMM space (£5-£30m) don’t typically expect models. It’s usually only when PE is involved that they request one.

For most of the deals I’ve worked on, I like to build a three-statement model, forecasts, and a DCF just to practice techs. I'll occasionally also put together a simple LBO to grasp the fundamentals and understand the high-level mechanics - as I'm hoping that will help w/ laterals down the line.

Curious to hear what others say too.

 

It’s normal, and why moving upstream is difficult. The issues and businesses you encounter at LMM are very different from MM or MF. Your value add at LMM is heavily weighted to professionalizing the company: accounting, hires, pricing, cash conversion, etc.

Models also only get you so far, and you don’t have the quantitative circle jerk in LMM that you would on MFs. You’re better off planning the operational overhaul than modelling a sensitivity analysis on a 50bps reduction in COGS on your IRR because your IC told you to run it.

 
Most Helpful

Asperiores delectus perspiciatis officiis officiis ut. Enim magni esse officiis voluptatem velit ut. Et labore voluptatem dolor laborum accusamus culpa occaecati. Quis tempora qui maiores. Et consectetur asperiores laborum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”