Jefferies vs UBS vs Citi

Recently received offers from these 3 shops. No specific groups in all 3 cases. Does BB > all still apply in this case? Heard the prospects for UBS and Citi are pretty terrible (e.g. possibility of delayed or even nil bonus at UBS) while Jefferies seems to be an up and comer.

Please advise.

18 Comments
 

Jefferies raided everyone who's anyone at UBS in the US, and Pandit is annoying and self-righteous so I'd go with the trend line and take Jefferies. Congrats.

‎"Until and unless you discover that money is the root of all good, you ask for your own destruction. When money ceases to become the means by which men deal with one another, then men become the tools of other men. Blood, whips and guns or dollars."
 

I wouldn't be so quick to ditch Citi... but agree that Jefferies is a great pick. Seriously though look into Citi some more.

Wall Street leaders now understand that they made a mistake, one born of their innocent and trusting nature. They trusted ordinary Americans to behave more responsibly than they themselves ever would, and these ordinary Americans betrayed their trust.
 
Best Response

I often see comments on the fact that people should go for the better franchise. If it was about owning the business, I would say yes, probably. But as an employee, not sure it's necessarily the best way to go. Better name does not mean better pay. Go through the MD&A of those investment banks and you'll see that the relation between franchise and average pay is not obvious. Yes, Goldman is consistently paying more than the other BBs. But there are many boutique investment banks out there that have higher average salaries than Goldman. Having a profitable business is good for the shareholders, not necessarily for the employees (most specifically when they cut in the bonuses to achieve that). What really matters is the amount of business generated per employee and and how close these employees are to the clients (is the business sticky to the firm?). Even if Citi is making a come back, it's a huge bureaucratic business that will never get to be involved in risk taking anymore. A come back is good for shareholders but you can be sure they will keep a tight grip on how the business is run going forward.

 
Eric Stratton
bulge4lyfNot sure what you mean by Citi having terrible prospects... if you're referring to bonuses they paid top of street for analysts last year. If you're referring to deal flow, I wouldn't worry about them too much.

Here's your order:

Citi > UBS > Jefferies.

Wasn't top bucket at Citi $65k?

Correct. On par with JPM and top of the street, if I remember correctly. If your interests are PE and B-School, Citi beats Jefferies. All this crap about revenue/employee, "up and coming" is irrelevant for an analyst. If you were a career banker (entering associate), then those points would have more weight. Culture is important but do not judge it by your interviewers. These are huge banks and culture is group specific. You will be placed in a generalist pool at both Citi and Jefferies so chances are you won't be working with any of your interviewers (maybe a couple).
 
HarvardOrBustI would assume that bulge4lyf is biased...

Bulge4lyf hates on any bank that isnt a BB. He would tell you to go to Lehman in the middle of it's collapse over Jefferies.

OP, that is a tough decision, but I would choose between Citi and Jefferies. Again, I will advise you to go based on the culture and people. Citi is a bigger name globally, however Jefferies is growing explosively.

 

Jefferies is a great firm with a ton of momentum and growth, as well as a terrific culture to boot.

That being said, if you are looking to go into PE and HF, Citi (and probably UBS) will still place significantly better to the top firms (Top 25 or Top 50) from what I have heard. Citi M&A and UBS LevFin are especially good.

With that in mind, If this is for an:

analyst position = pick Citi/UBS associate position = pick Jefferies

 

Appreciate all the great responses and insight. From the sound of it, the general consensus is to pick Jefferies over UBS but perhaps not over Citi. I definitely will look into it further.

I really enjoyed what I saw of the culture at Jefferies, whereas its a mixed bag at Citi. Kind of ruled out UBS after talking to an alum who is currently a VP, basically told me to avoid UBS America as long as it didn't mean I was going to go to a small regional. Additionally, I heard that comp is better at JEF for whatever reason (I believe they have the second highest revenue per employee ratio behind GS), not a deciding factor but certainly important.

For the moment I am interested in going into PE after my analyst stint and B-school afterwards so any insight regarding Citi vs Jefferies for PE would be much appreciated if that info is out there. Otherwise, thanks again!

 

Citi for sure if you are interested in PE; again, Jefferies is a great firm (and probably as a whole the better firm), but Citi has a stronger IBD and they are still solid on the league tables and work on large-cap transactions, something that is rare for Jefferies outside of Energy (which is located in Houston anyway so you won't have a chance to work on Exxon/XTO etc.).

Plus, the Blackstone/TPGs have hired Citi analysts (and quite often before the recession) before, but never a Jefferies one. Just 5-6 years ago, Citi was considered a top bank, right after GS/MS and Lehman Brothers

 

As someone who had a friend at Jef and had some alums intern there. I am unsure where the up and coming sentiment is coming from. Jeffries is still in many ways a MM firm. Citi Commercial Banking may be struggling but they've still got one of the best IB franchises. They are dealmakers so I would suggest picking Citi, my friends love the atmosphere and if you get a good group, you have good PE opps

 

Distinctio ut labore aperiam ipsam. Facilis aliquam rerum expedita nihil aut. Velit rem consequatur in doloremque cumque magni eum. Quia aspernatur eveniet repudiandae qui nobis odio.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”