15 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content:

  • Lazard:

    • Recent Challenges: Lazard has experienced a dip in their RX (restructuring) segment, exits, deal flow, and has seen a loss in MDs, particularly in the A&D team.
    • Historical Prestige: Despite recent challenges, Lazard still holds significant historical prestige and is considered more prestigious outside of finance.
    • Deal Flow and Exits: The interactive media side has good deal flow, but the A&D side has been impacted by the departure of senior members. Exits from Lazard NYC have included top firms like AEA, Carlyle, Centerbridge, Cerberus, Golden Gate, and others.
  • PWP (Perella Weinberg Partners):

    • Culture and Exits: PWP is known for having a great culture, but their exits are not yet up to the standard of Lazard or Moelis.
    • Growth: PWP is on the rise but still developing in terms of exit opportunities.
  • Guggenheim:

    • Not Specifically Mentioned: Guggenheim is not specifically detailed in the provided context, so no direct comparison can be made.

Decision Factors: - Prestige vs. Current Performance: Lazard's historical prestige is significant, but recent performance issues in RX and deal flow might be a concern. - Culture and Growth: PWP offers a strong culture and is growing, but may not yet match Lazard's exit opportunities. - Specific Preferences: Consider what is more important for your career goals—prestige, current deal flow, culture, or exit opportunities.

Ultimately, the decision should weigh Lazard's historical prestige and strong exits against PWP's growing reputation and culture. If Guggenheim is a consideration, further specific details would be needed to make a comprehensive comparison.

Sources: PWP LA, Lazard LA, and Houlihan LA (RX), NY Lazard vs PWP (SA 2024), (urgent) if you had to choose 1 for NY office: LAZ, PWP, or MOE?, Request for Restructuring League Tables 2018, Lazard vs. Greenhill vs. PWP NYC offers for 2021 SA

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Hot take. Gugg rx is better than both rn from a mandate quality perspective. At least recently they’ve been on much better debtor sides. Lazard is obviously falling off a bit and PWP has seemed to slow down as well. Exits still lazard/pwp

 

Lazard is falling both in M&A and RX in terms of deal flow/leauge tables. I would definitely take PWP because better experience there and exit differences are practically non-existent/splitting hairs. Gugg I would go either way depending on if your number 1 priority is exits or actual analyst experience. 

 
Controversial

Lol the Lazard slander on this site never fails to amaze me… Lazard has been at the top of M&A for 150+ years, and is a top tier institution by all accounts. PWP and Guggenheim are fantastic places as well, but anyone in the world of finance will tell you they don’t compare to Lazard (unless you are a 19 year old college sophomore of course)

 

Regardless of M&A or RX performance you’d be r*tarded to take PWP or GUG over LAZ unless it’s for culture reasons. Exits at LAZ are still top tier (especially for RX) and that won’t change for the next 4-5 years. LAZ is consistently up there with evercore for MF placement while GUG is basically nonexistent and PWP is nowhere near. Sure, if you want to be a career banker maybe Lazard isn’t the best option but for 99% of summers/FTs looking to go to PE it’s absolutely no question LAZ > PWP/GUG.

 

Eos tempore doloribus omnis voluptatum. Aliquid perspiciatis nobis repellat enim. Nostrum deleniti inventore quod voluptas voluptas in officiis laboriosam. Optio animi ut est nostrum voluptate ipsam rem. Consectetur laudantium earum illum neque. Eaque repudiandae architecto est at possimus voluptatem rerum.

Provident quia rerum inventore magnam nisi deserunt. Libero illo et explicabo aut ipsum debitis autem. Voluptatem harum quod voluptatibus qui impedit culpa eligendi. Ea et nesciunt libero magni unde voluptate. Hic ab ut temporibus dolorum qui tempora aut.

Eligendi sint minima qui tempora excepturi. Occaecati et quo officiis et debitis ducimus. Itaque asperiores totam est. Explicabo expedita dolores aspernatur dolorem autem omnis. Enim perspiciatis et quas enim. Laboriosam aut eos culpa nihil.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”