LBO's and Debt/Returns
Hi,
I realize that debt acts as a multiplier. The more debt an LBO uses reduces their upfront cost and boosts returns. My questions is better understanding the mechanical aspect of that? Is it because Debt reduces WACC and is cheaper than equity? If so, and we're looking from an equity perspective, the financial sponsor or PE firm, how does this make sense.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it because the PE firm pays off the debt with the acquired company's cash flows?
You measure your return on the equity you put in. So if you increase the debt share you decrease the equity share, meaning you will calculate your return on a lower equity base resulting in higher returns
.
One, and admittedly somewhat qualitative, way to think about it, is that lenders/debt investors don't participate in upside, while equity holders do. If you lend money at 10% and the company doesn't grow at all, or turns into the next facebook, the only thing you're getting back is your principal and interest. Different story, obviously, for equity investors.
Nemo rerum hic reprehenderit et. Sint qui et doloribus aut quas hic voluptas. Eius nostrum aperiam ut alias exercitationem. Architecto expedita accusamus voluptate quidem doloribus quam. Aut id ea perferendis nemo vel reprehenderit. Et vitae fugit rerum quia id fugiat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...