Leaving IB 6mo in for early-stage startup?
I’m a first-year RX analyst at a solid bank. I’m doing well so far, but I haven’t been on a truly meaningful deal yet, and a lot of the day-to-day is mind-numbing busywork. I like learning about companies, but I’m not convinced the traditional path (IB → PE) is what I actually want. Long-term, I’ve always had the itch to build/operate something — but I also recognize I’m early enough that my “startup gut feel” I've had forever could be naive.
I got a seed-stage offer from a stealth AI company selling into financial services. Strong investors, legit founding team. Comp is very competitive for the stage. The catch: the product is early and current traction is more services/implementation-heavy than pure software, so it’s not obvious yet what the steady-state looks like. The role is ops/product-facing, with the promise of shifting toward customer + product problem-solving after an initial ramp.
Why I’m considering it this early: if it works, joining pre-PMF could mean outsized learning + influence + real operating reps that I won’t get for years in finance. If it misses (or is “mid” — e.g., survives but I’m stuck in services-y work), worst case is I burned a strong path early and have to scramble in a weak job market.
What I’m trying to answer:
• Is leaving IB this early a career-killer if the startup is mid or fails?
• If my end-goal is operating/founding, is it smarter to stay 6–12 more months in IB to build a base (skills/savings/optionality), or does that not change much? I know I'm early, but I can't imagine really learning that much more...
• What are the most important diligence questions to de-risk role scope, runway, and whether I’ll actually get product reps?
Would appreciate blunt takes from anyone who’s done IB → startup (especially early) or has seen it go right/wrong.
Jumping into an early-stage startup from IB is a bold move, but it’s not necessarily a career-killer if approached thoughtfully. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s a breakdown of your situation:
1. Is leaving IB this early a career-killer if the startup is mid or fails?
2. Should you stay in IB for 6–12 more months to build a base?
Cons of staying:
Verdict: If you’re confident in the startup’s potential and your desire to operate/build, leaving now isn’t a bad move. But if you’re unsure about the startup or your readiness, staying a bit longer in IB could provide more clarity and optionality.
3. Key diligence questions to de-risk the role and startup:
Role Scope:
Runway:
Product Traction:
Team and Culture:
4. Final Thoughts:
Remember, there’s no perfect answer here—it’s about weighing your risk tolerance, long-term goals, and confidence in the startup’s potential. Good luck!
Sources: From PE >> Startup >> Back to PE, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/venture-capital/founding-a-startup-exit-opps-if-things-go-under?customgpt=1, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/venture-capital/early-stage-vc-101-5-questions-you-better-be-able-to-answer?customgpt=1, Is IB a good industry to break into for future entrepreneurs?, Q&A: Principal at Early-Stage VC Fund
Bump
What's your end-goal ultimately? If you have even the slightest interest in buyside, stay in IB. However, if you ultimately see yourself more in the start-up/tech space om the long run then you should take the startup offer to build more directly related experience/skillset.
Thanks, it’s honestly hard to gauge. I genuinely find learning about companies interesting (otherwise I wouldn’t want to build one), so investing could be a good fit… but I can’t tell how much of that is real vs. just being in IB surrounded by people who are all-in on PE/HF.
I've always wanted to take a swing at a startup (since high school - don't ask me why I've just had that itch) but I also recognize I’m only ~6 months into my career though, so it’s tough to pretend I have perfect conviction on the exact path or space, I just feel more pulled toward startups than investing right now.
I also don’t love the idea of “closing the door” on investing, but is the alternative is spending the next few years figuring out if it’s actually for me and then jumping to a startup later anyway? Staying in IB a bit longer is an option too, I’m just not sure another 6 months will suddenly make everything obvious.
Why are you in RX and not tech to begin with? Really odd and not sure if you’re open to a change (guessing you’re in NY since most rx groups are there) but why not recruit for tech banks in the Bay, have no clue what options would be available
Thanks, tbh I was just optimizing for a technical experience during soph recruiting. Being in a tech IB group would be closer to what I'm looking for, but it's still IB so I don't think that addresses whether to make the jump to a startup
i'll be real as far as skills go, the first 6-9 mo is sufficient in IB
Fair enough, haven't been on something that's really live so won't comment, but I can see that
Try wait for your first live experience then dip, just gives you something more concrete to talk about vs just doing market refreshes
In VC, with a lot of work and investments in that space. It's super competitive. Is the founder compelling? If not, you're better off joining one of the more scaled ones.
Perferendis aut nam cumque omnis ut voluptatum ea sed. Eligendi officiis officiis vel et. Similique fugit ipsam ipsam tempora quas.
Consequatur voluptatem quo sunt enim. Neque voluptatum consequatur eius quos ut doloribus. Aliquam deleniti facilis animi sed placeat earum nihil.
Atque sit quae numquam impedit totam commodi. Et libero vel libero animi.
Quia eaque debitis quo sit. Nihil soluta velit expedita cupiditate. Fugit pariatur quo aut eos placeat vel qui.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...