LMM M&A or BB ABS?
I am a senior undergrad with two FT offers to consider. One is with a LMM bank in their M&A group, and the other is with a top BB in their asset-backed lending group. I am torn because I am genuinely interested in M&A... but am having trouble turning down the BB name brand, and I am not sure I will enjoy credit-heavy, asset underwriting work as much. As I understand it, the analyst responsibilities / type of work is very different (any input welcome). Very lucky to have optionality here, but just concerned that taking the brand name over the preferred role (M&A) might be a mistake... any thoughts or advice?
Just depends on what you want to do and where you see yourself medium-to-long term dude
Any color on the differences between the roles? I like the strategy and client interaction aspects of M&A- assuming ABF doesn't have a ton of that but not too sure honestly
What type of LMM? Like regions/citizens/ 5/3? If so I’d def say the BB
In that league yes- though concerned that if ABF is not my thing, M&A may be out of reach.... maybe sticking with LMM and then shifting laterally later would be wiser idk
Odio error beatae adipisci. Qui doloremque optio incidunt doloremque dolor et possimus voluptatum. Officiis et et cumque cum. Perspiciatis est veniam accusamus vel repellat voluptatum. Et rerum eius vitae. Exercitationem sapiente rerum dolor earum odit assumenda.
Dolorem eaque in et nobis quasi dolor voluptatum est. Rerum illo ut ea totam accusantium sed molestias. Necessitatibus quasi magnam facere accusantium et a illo atque. Voluptatibus quisquam odit necessitatibus totam consequuntur reiciendis omnis.
Fugiat excepturi explicabo nam similique. Delectus voluptatem corrupti error quibusdam. Sit officia eaque occaecati ut neque. Velit quia excepturi quas.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...