M&A Go-Shop Provision and Breakup Fees
Say that we have AcquirerCo. submitting an initial bid of $100mm to acquire TargetCo., and TargetCo. is given a 2-months go-shop provision to seek higher bids. If TargetCo. ends up receiving a higher bid and decides to take that higher bid, it would have to pay a 3% breakup fee ($3mm) to AcquirerCo.
In this case, does it mean that rival bidders would have to bid at least $100mm + $3mm = $103mm in order to have a chance? And if a rival bidder bids $103mm, then AcquirerCo. could technically "match" the higher offer by keeping the initial bid of $100mm and not moving it up?
Sources like this always seem to mention that "go-shop provisions grant the original bidder the ability to match any competing offers". In this context, does "matching" a bid for AcquirerCo. means submitting an updated bid that's $3mm less than the rival bid?
For example, if a rival bidder emerged with a $107mm bid, can AcquirerCo. "match" that with a $107mm - $3mm = $104mm bid? They would mean technically the same due to the $3mm breakup fee, correct?
This is the way I understand these examples:
I think TargetCo would go to AcquirerCo before accepting the higher bid, asking for it to be matched. Then, if the bid is matched, there is no breakup fee paid out as TargetCo did not accept the second bid.
Delectus non nam delectus veniam ipsum voluptatum aperiam. Non quos minus sunt magni et tempora. Veniam et consequatur officiis culpa beatae cupiditate placeat cupiditate.
Dolor sit quia sed quo. Praesentium enim ipsum velit quas voluptas eius. Architecto corrupti illum aut nisi non quidem sed. Aperiam numquam illum laudantium alias enim. Iste explicabo ut cum maxime est ad eius veniam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...