Macquarie or HL for Tech IB?
Recently received offers from Macquarie and HL both for their tech teams in SF. Any insight as to which would be better?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +131 | New Article: Dramatic Slide as UBS #22 (US) & New Leadership Desperately Needed | 25 | 19h |
| +121 | Americas M&A League Table Q2 Updated | 55 | 2h |
| +76 | Wealthy Parents / Jaded | 24 | 1d |
| +61 | A COMPLETE GUIDE TO SUMMER INTERNSHIP RECRUITING | 11 | 1d |
| +59 | How are hours rn for SA (interns) | 31 | 1d |
| +44 | Boutique firm wants access to my LinkedIn? | 38 | 5h |
| +33 | Investment Banking in Mexico | 9 | 1d |
| +30 | Investment Banking is Hard | 13 | 7h |
| +27 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 3 | 9h |
| +21 | Excel macros for QOL formatting | 0 | 4d |
Career Resources
I would say HL is better. They're a better known and respected group and likely has higher deal flow.
Also known to pay more
HL tech team is strong after the GCA acquisition. Can’t speak for Macquarie.
The NY tech team’s culture seems good but I’ve heard bad things about SF.
I know Macquarie infrastructure & real estate teams are good an HL rx is top notch but not too sure about there Tech teams. Bump for others to help out
HL easily
Macquarie has a strong ed-tech team in Chicago
I think OP is asking about SF lol
Not too sure about SF HL Tech but the NYC Tech team is very fratty
Macquerie is a no name in my city (no tech here) so based off that alone I’d go HL
Recusandae et non consequuntur quo sequi non. Voluptatem debitis consequatur pariatur nemo aliquam dolores provident. Voluptate voluptatem nisi reprehenderit nulla libero consequatur. Dolores impedit asperiores numquam sed velit itaque quidem quae. Atque inventore nulla vero esse ipsam eos. Omnis error qui aut qui.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...