Macquarie or HL for Tech IB?
Recently received offers from Macquarie and HL both for their tech teams in SF. Any insight as to which would be better?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +260 | Earliest you can get fired | 56 | 14m |
| +244 | UBS’s M&A BANKERS ARE DOING TERRIBLY. $200M EXTRA IS BEING CUT | 43 | 11h |
| +220 | Career Crossroads | 31 | 8h |
| +220 | Investment Banking is Divine | 38 | 3h |
| +214 | US 2027 SA IB worried about background check | 52 | 14h |
| +206 | Analyst: Why is UBS IB doing worse than peers?, UBS CFO: No Comment | 41 | 1h |
| +204 | Another $115bn Mega deal for these banks. Congrats! | 43 | 8h |
| +49 | Is UBS really that bad? | 19 | 2h |
| +37 | Is Houston SA 28 recruiting already over? | 32 | 3h |
| +22 | Sweat Group 2026 Discussion | 24 | 3h |
Career Resources
I would say HL is better. They're a better known and respected group and likely has higher deal flow.
Also known to pay more
HL tech team is strong after the GCA acquisition. Can’t speak for Macquarie.
The NY tech team’s culture seems good but I’ve heard bad things about SF.
I know Macquarie infrastructure & real estate teams are good an HL rx is top notch but not too sure about there Tech teams. Bump for others to help out
HL easily
Macquarie has a strong ed-tech team in Chicago
I think OP is asking about SF lol
Not too sure about SF HL Tech but the NYC Tech team is very fratty
Macquerie is a no name in my city (no tech here) so based off that alone I’d go HL
Fuga et corporis quae possimus reiciendis nihil. Esse sunt nam qui sunt at et possimus ipsam. Est et itaque eius. Occaecati vitae qui maiores id pariatur quis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...