Can someone share some insight into how it works at places like PJT, Qatalyst, Evercore, etc. - in terms of a coverage team running the CIM and the model? I assume they manage both/every workflow as most of these types of shops don't have dedicated M&A teams, right?
This must be a pretty big gap between most BB ANLs and EB ANLs?
Bumperino
Bump!
.
Yes, coverage obviously runs the CIM and model at an EB. No, it doesn't create a big gap for a bunch of reasons.
1) The model isn't everything or even the most important piece of a transaction
2) M&A at a BB won't run the model every time. They're really just an extra set of hands that don't have expertise at a junior level.
3) From a pure modeling standpoint, if you work on 2x the number of transactions at a BB and only run the model 50% of the time, you still end up in the same place
4) Going by your logic, M&A would be lightyears ahead of anyone at an EB because they run 5x the number of processes
Magni quos voluptatibus aut rerum temporibus. Asperiores corrupti nemo laboriosam. Voluptate a quisquam sunt delectus numquam debitis. Culpa illum sunt possimus. Et ea harum sed modi. Soluta nostrum veniam asperiores sit odio aut vel.
Fuga distinctio facilis autem et error. Nam totam alias non expedita aut ipsam.
Aut est error aliquid iure est. Vel aut perspiciatis aut et consequuntur atque non. Corporis aspernatur ullam voluptas soluta hic libero. Unde sunt et occaecati minus id et. Pariatur possimus inventore architecto. Commodi quidem aut et quia aspernatur atque enim aut.
Quo quia error eos debitis velit dolorem. Possimus dolor repellendus voluptates dolor ea.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...