Hello all,
I know that we use NAV model to value E&P companies. So in NAV we use Revenue-production cost-capex-taxes as cash flows
Why don't we subtract interest expense here, as NAV is only for equity holders. Thanks.
| +115 | I think I’m logging off after ER visit | 23 | 13h |
| +97 | Article: UBS Quietly Hollowing Out Its Onshore Workforce and Rebuilding the Bank in India | 25 | 6d |
| +94 | Is it Bad That I ALREADY Don’t Care? | 28 | 1h |
| +84 | Senior Banker's Guide to IB Recruiting / Group Placement (with a Healthcare Bent) | 10 | 14s |
| +79 | AI Creating More Work | 25 | 5h |
| +59 | Consulting Son or CorpDev Daughter? | 6 | 4d |
| +55 | Shit PWP Culture | 40 | 3h |
| +44 | How easy was recruiting for you? | 21 | 4d |
| +35 | 22yo IB Analyst just had mental health breakdown | 11 | 1d |
| +26 | How tf do i control a stutter? | 13 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
bump
What you outlined is an asset level NAV. Usually you’ll overlay a corporate model which will incorporate debt.
Thanks!
So you mean while calculating a firm's NAV, I would need to subtract interest?
So it would be like adding all asset level NAV's - tax adjusted interest expense?
Eligendi numquam adipisci consequuntur omnis et voluptatibus voluptas et. Veniam voluptatem asperiores qui et. Tempore expedita quia omnis dicta.
Voluptates voluptatem numquam ratione. Unde at impedit omnis quia voluptatem cupiditate facilis.
Ab omnis consequatur qui fugiat mollitia molestiae expedita. Suscipit quas omnis eius aut sunt.
Ut facere amet sapiente eos ut. Repellendus quo et amet iste facilis quidem dolorem. Quae quia vero ut repellat est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...