New M&A Accounting Adustment (FASB 141R)

All,

I have heard various answers as to how to correctly adjust for FASB 141R regarding the transaction costs in the PF Balance Sheet (net against buyer's retained earnings?) and subsequent Year 1 Income Statement expensing. Opening up to the forum for the correct adjustments in the above statements at close and during Year 1.

11 Comments
 
Best Response

TRANSACTION COSTS. Under FAS 141R, the direct costs of a business combination--such as transaction fees, due diligence, consulting services and the buyer's cost of issuing debt or equity securities--will no longer be included in measurement of the business acquired. Instead, those direct costs will be recognized as expenses of the period in which they are incurred and the services received, except for the costs of issuing debt and equity securities, which shall be recognized in accordance with other applicable generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). So, the buyer's income statement takes a bigger hit right away.

So advisory fees, legal fees, etc will be charged as a 1-time expense on the P&L and thus only hit the B/S in so far as reducing net income and therefore retained earnings. That's how I read it at least.

 

so what happens for the PF BS adjustments? The transaction costs would have previously been capitalized with the financing costs. Would this now be balanced in the goodwill calculation? Then the transaction costs would be expensed in the acquisition period of the IS.

 

That's the question of the hour. If you do that, than you should be tax affecting the change to your retained earnings and cash balance by the appropriate corporate tax rate to simulate its flow through the income statement. I don't believe this is correct. If you adjust the retained earnings of a financial sponsor, than it lowers the equity value contributed at close and alters returns at exit.

 

PRIOR TO FASB 141(R)...

Purchase Price (Equity consideration) - Book Value of Net Assets + Existing Goodwill = Excess Purchase Price

Then, Excess Purchase Price - Write-Ups of Intangibles + Deferred Taxes + TRANSACTION FEES = Total New Goodwill

As you can see, transaction fees were added into goodwill, thus increasing the implied Purchase Price of the acquired entity. However, currently, under FASB 141(R) these transaction fees are expensed immediately and hit retained earnings in your pro forma balance sheet adjustments. As stated above, debt / equity issuance fees hit an asset account on your pro forma balance sheet as capitalized costs.

Note: Deferred Taxes are only created in a stock (as opposed) to asset deal due to account for timing differences. In an asset deal, you're required to write off your step-up over a certain period (I think 12 years??)

 

LCR:

Confused on your last point... in a stock deal, a DTL is created because write-ups are amortized/depreciated for accounting purposes but not tax purposes -- so the DTL is written down over time to hit the cash flow statement. In an asset/338(h)10 deal, no DTL is created initially, but there is a step-up over time due to the amortization of goodwill for tax purposes (15 years). So the goodwill is amortized off the books, resulting in lower taxes, which results in a yearly increase in DTL so the cash can hit the cash flow statement.

 

Et natus nihil eos numquam quaerat recusandae voluptatum. Laudantium voluptatem dignissimos quibusdam occaecati assumenda laudantium asperiores. Qui eum dolor eligendi harum ratione eum. Id impedit quia nesciunt corrupti illo vel est omnis.

Tempore voluptatem voluptatem rerum consectetur et deserunt. Earum ut porro aliquam maxime quidem aut.

Dolores consequatur ipsa quia qui ea deserunt. Voluptatum harum quia reiciendis sint. Cum laboriosam placeat dolor amet hic similique ea.

Dignissimos aut veritatis atque. Cumque inventore aut corporis temporibus deleniti tempore. Cum autem exercitationem voluptatem in optio. Quisquam fugiat ut amet. Incidunt ut suscipit libero tempora. Maxime sed magnam quisquam adipisci fuga ducimus itaque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan No 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”