12 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a breakdown to help you decide:

  1. Exit Opportunities:

    • FT Partners is highly regarded for its niche focus on financial technology, which can lead to strong exits into fintech, growth equity, or tech-focused private equity roles.
    • Truist and Santander are more regional players, with Truist having a stronger presence in the Southeast and Santander being more prominent in Europe and Latin America. Their exit opportunities may be more limited compared to FT Partners, especially for NYC-based roles.
  2. Training:

    • FT Partners is known for its rigorous deal exposure and hands-on experience, which can be excellent for skill-building.
    • Truist and Santander may offer solid training programs, but they are generally not as intense or specialized as FT Partners.
  3. Prestige:

    • FT Partners has a strong reputation in its niche (fintech), which can be valuable if you're targeting that sector.
    • Truist and Santander are less prestigious on a global scale but are well-respected in their respective regions.
  4. Pay:

    • Compensation at FT Partners is typically competitive, especially for a boutique firm, and may outpace Truist and Santander for NYC roles.
    • Truist and Santander may offer slightly lower pay, but this can vary depending on the specific role and location.
  5. Culture and Work-Life Balance:

    • FT Partners is known for a demanding culture with long hours, which can be a trade-off for the strong deal experience.
    • Truist and Santander may offer a slightly better work-life balance, but this can vary by team.

Recommendation:

If you're looking for the best exits, training, and prestige, FT Partners is likely the top choice, especially if you're interested in fintech or tech-focused roles. However, if you prioritize work-life balance or have a specific interest in regional opportunities, Truist or Santander could be better fits.

Sources: Which cities do you think provide the most opportunities?, Received offers from all three MBB firms and don't know what to do, 8 Reflections on Leaving IB After a Decade, NYC Capital Advisory Firm - Hiring Intern

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Ut et quia libero. Quo ipsam dicta nihil nesciunt molestiae aut. Corrupti odio dicta similique voluptatem nam.

Labore officia animi inventore velit. Quia nemo dolor labore atque ad sunt maiores. Ipsa alias error possimus harum numquam. Autem non earum culpa laboriosam ad. Expedita non nam et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”