12 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a breakdown to help you decide:

  1. Exit Opportunities:

    • FT Partners is highly regarded for its niche focus on financial technology, which can lead to strong exits into fintech, growth equity, or tech-focused private equity roles.
    • Truist and Santander are more regional players, with Truist having a stronger presence in the Southeast and Santander being more prominent in Europe and Latin America. Their exit opportunities may be more limited compared to FT Partners, especially for NYC-based roles.
  2. Training:

    • FT Partners is known for its rigorous deal exposure and hands-on experience, which can be excellent for skill-building.
    • Truist and Santander may offer solid training programs, but they are generally not as intense or specialized as FT Partners.
  3. Prestige:

    • FT Partners has a strong reputation in its niche (fintech), which can be valuable if you're targeting that sector.
    • Truist and Santander are less prestigious on a global scale but are well-respected in their respective regions.
  4. Pay:

    • Compensation at FT Partners is typically competitive, especially for a boutique firm, and may outpace Truist and Santander for NYC roles.
    • Truist and Santander may offer slightly lower pay, but this can vary depending on the specific role and location.
  5. Culture and Work-Life Balance:

    • FT Partners is known for a demanding culture with long hours, which can be a trade-off for the strong deal experience.
    • Truist and Santander may offer a slightly better work-life balance, but this can vary by team.

Recommendation:

If you're looking for the best exits, training, and prestige, FT Partners is likely the top choice, especially if you're interested in fintech or tech-focused roles. However, if you prioritize work-life balance or have a specific interest in regional opportunities, Truist or Santander could be better fits.

Sources: Which cities do you think provide the most opportunities?, Received offers from all three MBB firms and don't know what to do, 8 Reflections on Leaving IB After a Decade, NYC Capital Advisory Firm - Hiring Intern

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Qui assumenda qui est harum voluptatem qui. Voluptatem est minus occaecati nulla. Fugit tempora totam quo pariatur est et enim voluptatum. Rerum similique nobis repellat odit voluptatem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (47) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (74) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”