Pedigree
I heard Blackstone valued Ivy (+Stanford/MIT) UG and HSW MBA pedigree. Does PJT still care as much?
Which other firms are known for placing emphasis on pure pedigree?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +197 | Americas M&A League Table Q2 Updated | 78 | 7h |
| +142 | New Article: Dramatic Slide as UBS #22 (US) & New Leadership Desperately Needed | 38 | 15h |
| +131 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 34 | 1d |
| +101 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 47 | 2h |
| +89 | Woman who emptied Knicks trashcan on street then stole it was DEI exec, worked at JPMorgan Chase | 24 | 7h |
| +75 | Stop sleeping on UBS - it’s pretty good | 24 | 9h |
| +51 | 2026 VAULT PRESTIGE RANKINGS | 29 | 20h |
| +39 | AI + Financial Modelling | 12 | 16h |
| +28 | Summer before college | 17 | 5h |
| +27 | Hardest interview experiences? | 16 | 14h |
Career Resources
Blackstone/PJT (particularly their restructuring group) has always placed their emphasis on hiring the smartest kids and it just so happens that most of smart kids go to top schools (Harvard, Wharton, etc.) That being said, if you do a little research, there have been 1-2 kids from non-Harvard, Wharton backgrounds (think Ross Michigan, Northwestern, Duke, Princeton, etc.) every analyst class so it's not impossible if you aren't from Harvard or Wharton.
Which of the top funds care more/less about pedigree? (Originally Posted: 04/21/2011)
Seeing the thread about how various funds care more about school/GPA even after the analyst programs than others, I think if any experienced folk can share their experiences with which funds are more open to "average" backgrounds that'll be great for those of us out there who have a Public School 3.4/Deutsche Bank or Barclays rather than a Harvard 3.9 / Goldman TMT so we know which funds to target and which are a waste of time.
seems like Silver Lake, Bain Cap, Paulson are very pedigree-focused, Carlyle seems to be more open. anyone have any other info?
get tha fuck outta here bro
I'm pretty sure the funds will target you if you're what they're looking for. Not the other way around.
Pedigree in IB: Analysts >> Associates (Originally Posted: 10/06/2016)
Trying to make the jump at some point in my career, and from a pretty large sample size, yet still not completely representative number, it seems like the pedigree and backgrounds of investment banking analysts tend to be more impressive than associates or those that become associates later on. Do you feel that this is true? Especially when top analysts leave after 2-3 years for PE/HF or just leave banking altogether, and then take into account people that enter banking at the associate level.
My experience is only real estate related but I def agree with you
Quia hic quod corrupti explicabo aut dignissimos. Neque temporibus enim est. Eaque qui autem minus est enim. Illo vitae dolores quis ipsa.
Non dicta deleniti vitae est. Nemo dignissimos expedita dolorem quia natus. Pariatur autem consequatur modi. Perferendis quia ex eum. Dolor ab qui sed sunt ex.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...