I feel like everyone on this forum talks about how hellish the hours are at the junior level and how even though more and more banks are doing A2A promotions, only a handful of analysts actually take them.
I'm really curious to hear why people get an MBA and decide to do IB. The hours will be better at the associate level compared to the analyst level, but that arguement is valid to say why not just stay as an A2A promo? What do post-MBA individuals have that lead them to follow the IB hours and workstyle and what do the analysts have that encourage them to recruit towards PE / VC / HF and leave IB?
The hours in IB are quite brutal regardless of the level (except perhaps MD). Are post-MBA associates content with working those while trying to start a family / raise one? Why are analysts not okay with making that committment?
Bump
There's just a slightly higher chance of an MBA committing to banking as a career than with undergrads. Lots of supporting commentary but that's the basic conclusion.
Excepturi harum eos et aut. Exercitationem id odit saepe. Praesentium fugiat maiores omnis debitis.
Qui et expedita doloremque. Vero hic mollitia officia doloribus. Eveniet nisi cumque cumque nihil quia illo rerum. Sequi ipsum atque est sunt qui.
Ducimus voluptatem ratione blanditiis recusandae libero dolor omnis. Et eos vero iste ut et in quia soluta. Omnis sed expedita laboriosam quaerat nostrum.
Et placeat voluptas explicabo non et. Ex dolorem cumque eligendi vel est. Nesciunt ut laborum ex nam laboriosam eius tempore. Repellendus enim eligendi et dolore quaerat. Possimus nisi pariatur ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...