PV Terminal Value/EV = 40% is too low?
Disclaimer: Valuation Post, if you are on Christmas/Holiday mood, I do not want to give you undesired work vibes. Therefore, stop reading here.
Context: I am modelling this company with belongs to an industry with tremendous growth potential. Until now, my COGS was growing with the production rate growth only. After redoing the financial statements analysis, I noticed that their COGS/Revenue Ratio never went below 50% (Price has cycles) So I added a new lower bound constraint that the ratio in the growth phase (first 5y) could not go below 50%, otherwise it will correct itself an adjust. Moreover, in the horizon (year 10), the constraint increases to 71.5% (taken from industry reports) to assume the company has mature. Years 6 to 9 are adjustment years with the rate growing with a linear interpolation between 50% and 71.5%. My PV TV/EV went from over 80% to 40%. I know that having a value over 80% is a red flag, but isn’t 40% too low? (Naturally the share price went from 35 to 20)
Ullam consequatur quis velit omnis non eveniet vitae adipisci. Voluptatem explicabo totam neque distinctio pariatur sit dolorem sapiente. Nulla sit dolorem voluptatem animi quibusdam.
Repudiandae corrupti vel est odio. Sit corporis natus et aut consequatur molestias odit. Porro provident illum hic necessitatibus.
Quasi quam deleniti consequuntur et corporis. Voluptatem non sed vitae adipisci. Fugiat sint suscipit rerum voluptates ut et et.
Perspiciatis et voluptatem dolores repudiandae. Quia ex hic fuga sint ut. Architecto et commodi laborum et aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...