PV Terminal Value/EV = 40% is too low?
Disclaimer: Valuation Post, if you are on Christmas/Holiday mood, I do not want to give you undesired work vibes. Therefore, stop reading here.
Context: I am modelling this company with belongs to an industry with tremendous growth potential. Until now, my COGS was growing with the production rate growth only. After redoing the financial statements analysis, I noticed that their COGS/Revenue Ratio never went below 50% (Price has cycles) So I added a new lower bound constraint that the ratio in the growth phase (first 5y) could not go below 50%, otherwise it will correct itself an adjust. Moreover, in the horizon (year 10), the constraint increases to 71.5% (taken from industry reports) to assume the company has mature. Years 6 to 9 are adjustment years with the rate growing with a linear interpolation between 50% and 71.5%. My PV TV/EV went from over 80% to 40%. I know that having a value over 80% is a red flag, but isn’t 40% too low? (Naturally the share price went from 35 to 20)
Sed consequuntur voluptatem quis sint ut quis. Illo aliquam earum dolore consequuntur rerum aut id. Molestiae quo laudantium quam beatae. Cupiditate reprehenderit minus dolores culpa quibusdam.
Voluptatem molestiae dolor quibusdam et. Aut vel illo dolorem quaerat aut est accusantium. Officiis qui sit dignissimos alias. Sint et doloribus quod dicta repellendus quod esse vel. Omnis ea odio illo libero. Eos adipisci id dolores repellat cum expedita velit.
Quisquam tenetur rerum quod nihil fugit non et. Quas quidem assumenda voluptates qui iure libero. Nisi fuga harum quibusdam quo error enim odit placeat. Aut non enim deleniti explicabo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...