quick question about FCFE

reading about levered free cash flow and am trying to understand it better. is this technically a correct calculation?

EBT(1-t) +D&A + other non cash expenses- capex- change NWC

is there anything wrong with using this formula as opposed to using CFO-capex, which also gets you levered free cash flow?

 
Most Helpful

CFO - CapEx doesn’t get you to levered free cash flow. It gets you to plain free cash flow - not levered or unlevered (AKA free cash flow to equity and free cash flow to the firm, respectively). Free cash flow represents disposable cash for the business.

LFCF represents the amount of cash left that “belongs” to common equity holders. UFCF represents the amount of cash left that “belongs”’to everyone who had a stake in the firm.

Your equation is kind of correct, but I want to clarify to make sure you don’t get tripped up; you don’t add back every single non-cash expense. For example, you add back SBC in CFO because it’s technically a non-cash expense, but you can’t do this for levered free cash flow. SBC isn’t a true non-cash expense because it causes dilution; if you add it back then you’re saying it has no expense, and it won’t get you to LFCF properly. If you have more SBC in a year, then current common equity holders will “receive” less earnings because there are more people sharing these earnings, so it has a cost. There are other small discrepancies you’ll have to look into for the non-cash expenses.

Free cash flow = CFO - CapEx UFCF = NOPAT + D&A (some other non-cash expenses too but it’s simplest to just say D&A) - CapEx - changes in NWC LFCF = Net income + D&A - CapEx - changes in NWC - mandatory debt payments

Hope this helps.

 

no because those are financing cash flows. I would actually not include mandatory debt pay down as an item for LFCF. paying down mandatory debt increases the portion of EV that is due to equity, and so similar to the SBC argument, I would think that shouldn’t be a component “expense” of LFCF. but that’s just me. a lot of formulas say to take it out, but from a theory perspective I feel different

 

Why wouldn't CFO - Capex get you levered free cash flows? I thought that it gets you levered free cash flows because CFOs are calculated by taking Net income (which is already levered as Interest expense has been subtracted out), adding back non-cash charges such as D&A, and adjusting for changes in NWC. All thats left is Capex from CFI to be subtracted out.

 

That's what I(OP) thought as well. Figured that it gets you to levered and then from there you would just add back tax adjusted interest expense and tax adjusted interest income to get your cash flow independent of all debt

 

That's not entirely true. CFO - CapEx is free cash flow, not levered free cash flow. CFO adds back certain items that aren't entirely accurate. Like I mentioned earlier, stock based compensation is an example of this. If you get a room filled with 10 associates, they will likely give you a mix of responses on how to calculate FCFEbecause some stuff is up to interpretation, but CFO - CapEx is certainly not the same as FCFE.

Here's a great link from CFI to if you want a deeper explanation of the differences between FCF, FCFF, and FCFE: https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/valuation/fcf…

An even better link from Wall Street Prep to explain the principle: https://www.wallstreetprep.com/knowledge/stock-based-compensation-treat…

 

I must be the only one who thought this question was referencing one of Brady's 200 accounts...

 

Saepe laborum excepturi quisquam sed nihil omnis atque. Recusandae consectetur ut similique dolore placeat eveniet voluptate odio. Illo quisquam vel laboriosam autem dolorem fuga doloremque. Earum consectetur adipisci tempore eum aliquam velit.

Nulla consequatur cum quo expedita veniam. Veritatis dolorem ipsum voluptatem enim et.

Sequi aut quo dolore sunt. Quia quis magni omnis voluptatem. Aperiam sit harum sunt molestiae eum enim est. Eum dolorum porro sit aut nulla voluptatum facere. Et ipsam ratione similique. Maxime odit aut sunt et quaerat quas minima. Unde assumenda at nulla quo fuga.

Accusantium voluptatem voluptatem corporis ut magni voluptatem maxime. Vitae eum pariatur sit voluptatem consectetur voluptate. Ea est dolores fugiat fuga. Repellat unde quam illo.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”