RBC Says Former CFO’s Texts Show Romance With Another Executive
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-08-1…
*title Don’t mess with RBC !
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +305 | I Snuck Into UBS Office And Took A Shit On The Floor | 28 | 1d |
| +250 | Houston 2026 Oil & Gas Investment Banking Rankings | 65 | 2h |
| +244 | Why leave restructuring for M&A? | 30 | 1d |
| +232 | Best Power/Renewables/Energy Teams? | 39 | 11h |
| +193 | Predicted 1Q 2027 Story - UBS IB blames Outlook Outage for Down Quarter | 37 | 2h |
| +188 | Centerview HC group falling off? | 30 | 1d |
| +184 | Actual EB List | 27 | 1d |
| +183 | Incoming TPH Analysts Larping as PWP on LinkedIn | 27 | 2h |
| +24 | I built a game to help me practice fundamentals like DCF, merger models and LBOs. Roast it? | 6 | 3h |
| +21 | What’s the current state of IBD at BofA? | 26 | 18h |
Career Resources
Does she have a lazy eye or am I tripping?
LowCaliberTalent
I don't get it. How is a supposed relationship between an executive and an employee considered grounds for firing? Same thing happened with Bernard Looney, former boss of BP. Is it simply because the executive in question has the influence to elevate the employee's career internally? Like, why is it such a big deal that it commands the front pages of Bloomberg/others? Or is it just hot gossip?
answer: "undisclosed close personal relationship with another employee which led to preferential treatment of the employee including promotion and compensation increases"
Lots of factors come in to play, I guess one being RSUs in the form of unvested shares, RBC board probably views these situations as a cost cutting measure ; 1) fire the female cfo, 2) Save money, live better (buy Walmart shares using the newly secured RSUs), and 3) hire an upcoming male CFO
Tbh it’s quite unsurprising a strong balance sheet bank, such as RBC came to this solution.
It seemed that she was a good CFO based on experience. I think they just wanted to get rid of her and had strong evidence to back this case. Alot of execs equally has this amount of dirt but are untouchable.
Magni minima eaque aut numquam dolor dicta. Dignissimos eligendi sequi enim neque id. Consequatur dolor eos enim architecto deserunt sunt. Est repellendus nihil laudantium eaque consequuntur possimus.
Molestiae iusto voluptas deleniti reprehenderit. Ut dolor quidem vitae et quidem ipsum minima. Quam consectetur numquam rerum aut quos est sint sed.
Aliquid in voluptates et. Ipsam ipsam animi officia culpa. Harum error et distinctio eos. Placeat reiciendis suscipit quas omnis consequatur velit. Alias quaerat quam laborum ullam voluptatibus iure animi. Suscipit vel consequuntur assumenda eligendi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Tempora ducimus quam et architecto laboriosam dolorem. Omnis ex quasi exercitationem culpa. Accusamus sint saepe sunt eum nemo quam molestiae. Illo sed rerum dicta quaerat vel voluptas. Quaerat odio ratione repellat. Dolorem modi est velit nihil aut ex.
Incidunt velit qui neque nihil molestiae quasi. Facilis facilis voluptas consequuntur molestiae id. Molestias enim ut ratione tempora qui ipsam corporis. Non aut voluptatem ea molestiae vel ut at.
Aut nostrum reprehenderit porro non et. Explicabo optio eaque sunt quis sequi nostrum.