RBC Says Former CFO’s Texts Show Romance With Another Executive
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-08-1…
*title Don’t mess with RBC !
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +197 | Americas M&A League Table Q2 Updated | 77 | 21h |
| +142 | New Article: Dramatic Slide as UBS #22 (US) & New Leadership Desperately Needed | 38 | 1h |
| +131 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 34 | 19h |
| +95 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 46 | 47m |
| +86 | Woman who emptied Knicks trashcan on street then stole it was DEI exec, worked at JPMorgan Chase | 22 | 3h |
| +79 | A COMPLETE GUIDE TO SUMMER INTERNSHIP RECRUITING | 15 | 1h |
| +59 | Stop sleeping on UBS - it’s pretty good | 17 | 2h |
| +50 | 2026 VAULT PRESTIGE RANKINGS | 29 | 6h |
| +39 | Investment Banking is Hard | 17 | 2d |
| +39 | AI + Financial Modelling | 12 | 3h |
Career Resources
Does she have a lazy eye or am I tripping?
LowCaliberTalent
I don't get it. How is a supposed relationship between an executive and an employee considered grounds for firing? Same thing happened with Bernard Looney, former boss of BP. Is it simply because the executive in question has the influence to elevate the employee's career internally? Like, why is it such a big deal that it commands the front pages of Bloomberg/others? Or is it just hot gossip?
answer: "undisclosed close personal relationship with another employee which led to preferential treatment of the employee including promotion and compensation increases"
Lots of factors come in to play, I guess one being RSUs in the form of unvested shares, RBC board probably views these situations as a cost cutting measure ; 1) fire the female cfo, 2) Save money, live better (buy Walmart shares using the newly secured RSUs), and 3) hire an upcoming male CFO
Tbh it’s quite unsurprising a strong balance sheet bank, such as RBC came to this solution.
It seemed that she was a good CFO based on experience. I think they just wanted to get rid of her and had strong evidence to back this case. Alot of execs equally has this amount of dirt but are untouchable.
Hic necessitatibus itaque odit et mollitia. Odio voluptas voluptas expedita aut ab. Facilis voluptas ut perferendis modi dolores aut.
Velit est eveniet autem voluptas et magni iusto. Eveniet harum dolores culpa qui saepe. Culpa deleniti quae esse non. Qui mollitia temporibus autem recusandae eum rem suscipit labore.
Eligendi consequatur eligendi autem cupiditate eligendi rerum. Illo modi magni alias sit sit veritatis. Id laboriosam qui expedita iusto dolores.
Quia assumenda quia animi quos. Sint ab quis quisquam voluptatem. Deserunt eligendi nihil saepe nihil voluptas. Quasi laudantium impedit aut sunt ipsam dolorem. Quia dicta sit dicta quasi cumque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Cupiditate incidunt quo in voluptatem quibusdam. Nobis id ab totam harum. Est cupiditate voluptatem aut officia provident. Enim magnam aut ut consequatur deleniti et molestiae suscipit. Provident adipisci expedita eos hic quod. Repellat nulla id et rerum. Unde rerum qui ex dicta et sed.
Est aut porro illo earum odio. Autem aut dicta saepe qui id expedita exercitationem sed. Voluptates aut id ut fugit sed nulla veritatis. Eius incidunt quaerat ut iusto.
Aut nemo accusantium impedit voluptatem quidem et. Eum corrupti praesentium et. Et voluptatibus architecto officia facere aut. Et quasi voluptate temporibus dolores quaerat voluptatem. Dolores error maiores molestias quaerat nam.
Voluptas aut nihil explicabo ut. Iure itaque cum iste deserunt molestiae laborum. Molestias distinctio tempore molestias ut provident tempore.