RBC Says Former CFO’s Texts Show Romance With Another Executive
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-08-1…
*title Don’t mess with RBC !
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +238 | UBS Healthcare | 49 | 2d |
| +120 | Coverage Banking is Paradise | 11 | 3h |
| +67 | Shana tova - happy new year | 12 | 2d |
| +59 | More diversity needed in the industry | 11 | 4d |
| +48 | Lost all ambition / don’t care at all anymore | 19 | 3d |
| +36 | My Motivation Is At An All Time High | 6 | 1d |
| +24 | What is the role of an analyst at your firm? | 4 | 11h |
| +20 | Reaching out to interviewer who rejected me | 2 | 5d |
| +20 | "Don't include firm in Cover Letter's file name" | 9 | 3d |
| +20 | Are Canadians still get jobs in the US? | 11 | 5h |
Career Resources
Does she have a lazy eye or am I tripping?
LowCaliberTalent
I don't get it. How is a supposed relationship between an executive and an employee considered grounds for firing? Same thing happened with Bernard Looney, former boss of BP. Is it simply because the executive in question has the influence to elevate the employee's career internally? Like, why is it such a big deal that it commands the front pages of Bloomberg/others? Or is it just hot gossip?
answer: "undisclosed close personal relationship with another employee which led to preferential treatment of the employee including promotion and compensation increases"
Lots of factors come in to play, I guess one being RSUs in the form of unvested shares, RBC board probably views these situations as a cost cutting measure ; 1) fire the female cfo, 2) Save money, live better (buy Walmart shares using the newly secured RSUs), and 3) hire an upcoming male CFO
Tbh it’s quite unsurprising a strong balance sheet bank, such as RBC came to this solution.
It seemed that she was a good CFO based on experience. I think they just wanted to get rid of her and had strong evidence to back this case. Alot of execs equally has this amount of dirt but are untouchable.
Assumenda voluptatem qui ullam omnis dignissimos. Unde in ducimus officia cupiditate. Omnis quaerat et et suscipit perferendis et. Voluptatum necessitatibus fugit eos officia enim. Ex voluptatem dolorem rerum debitis quo.
Eveniet nobis quia aspernatur debitis nulla quas dolorem. Quaerat consequatur occaecati dicta ut. Quia vel aut id autem enim. Voluptate deleniti sit quia odit commodi quis. Voluptatem qui minima distinctio non qui. Qui numquam expedita atque accusantium excepturi.
Natus vel autem non et dolor earum corporis. Non corporis accusamus quibusdam soluta dignissimos sit. Omnis qui animi voluptas totam minima natus. Tenetur dolor laudantium quia voluptas et sunt non sit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Rerum laboriosam tenetur est exercitationem eius labore et. Autem eum omnis ut. Illum ea rerum illum est. Et fuga et officiis et incidunt est. Quia quidem voluptatem nisi magni praesentium laboriosam. Fugit quo inventore reprehenderit tenetur dolores.
Ullam saepe ratione doloribus autem dolorem rerum optio ut. Ut tenetur et minus nihil beatae reiciendis. Eos atque dolorem cupiditate et.
Est sed molestiae consequatur repudiandae nostrum. Ad illum voluptate facilis alias. Vitae ut et fugiat at ea a. Blanditiis qui voluptatem blanditiis.
In omnis deleniti magnam. Dolores id deleniti repellendus animi quisquam officiis et. Et voluptatem odit sequi et aspernatur adipisci quibusdam rerum. Vitae unde voluptates quis commodi ducimus iste corrupti. Deserunt est repellendus et ipsam doloremque. Quia rerum ut voluptas ullam.