Coverage Banking is Paradise
It’s 7:38 AM. You wake up to three Outlook notifications and a message from your associate asking if you’re “good for the 8:15.” The 8:15 is a coverage call on the North American industrial wastewater valve market. You briefly consider killing yourself. Instead, you open the deck.
Page 6 is titled Key Themes in Flow-Control End Markets. Page 14 is a map of municipal wastewater facilities across the Midwest. Page 22 contains a chart showing replacement cycles for stainless-steel butterfly valves. Somewhere along the way, this became your life.
You joined coverage because an MD told you it was the best place to be if you “really want to understand companies.” You believed him. Three months later, you know the EBITDA margins, capex profiles, management teams, and trading multiples of 47 businesses that collectively produce things nobody has ever voluntarily thought about.
You can explain why aftermarket service revenue drives multiple expansion in industrial pump manufacturing but you can't explain why your girlfriend left you.
Your parents ask what you do for work. You say investment banking. They ask what deals you’re working on, you change the subject.
Coverage banking is about relationships. The MD knows every CEO. The VP knows every CFO. You do not know any women.
Then it finally happens, a live M&A deal. Your heart rate spikes. This is what you came here for. The M&A team joins the call. They build the merger model. LevFin handles the debt. ECM handles the equity. You handle the industry overview.
The M&A analyst tells you they are working through purchase price allocation. You tell them the font on page 19 is still Arial. Different skill sets, same team.
Your group head reminds everyone that coverage bankers are “the quarterbacks of the relationship.” You repeat this phrase constantly, it helps. You do not mention that the quarterback is currently updating a page titled Selected Sector Tailwinds while M&A is actually executing the transaction.
Pitching is where coverage really shines. A client is “evaluating strategic alternatives,” which means nobody knows what the fuck they want to do. You spend two weeks preparing 94 pages laying out every conceivable option: sell-side, buy-side, spin, recap, JV, minority raise, partnership, strategic review, do nothing. The client selects the final option.
Your MD walks out of the meeting and says it went “really well.” You immediately begin another pitch.
Over time, you learn that the central philosophy of coverage is “staying close.” You send valuation updates, market updates, earnings updates, transaction announcements, and articles with “FYI — thought this might be relevant.” You stay close for three years. Eventually, another bank wins the mandate.
Your MD says relationships are a long game.
At some point, your coverage sector stops being a job and becomes a neurological condition. Someone at a party asks what you do. You say you cover industrials. They ask what that means. You begin explaining fragmented end markets, secular tailwinds, and recurring aftermarket revenue. They look for an escape route. You keep going. They eventually pretend they need to use the bathroom, their loss
By year two, earnings season becomes genuinely exciting to you. You wake up at 6:17 AM to read transcripts voluntarily. Management says pricing remains resilient and backlog is healthy. You immediately text your associate: “Interesting.”
He replies: “Yep.”
This is the closest thing you have to emotional intimacy.
Then PE recruiting starts. A headhunter asks what deals you’ve worked on. You say you’ve “had exposure to a number of strategic situations.” They ask which ones closed. You say the pipeline is "very active".
They ask if you built the model. You explain that M&A handled most of the transaction mechanics because your team was “quarterbacking the relationship.”
There is a pause long enough for you to hear your career prospects deteriorating.
You suddenly understand why the M&A analysts have been smirking at you for two years.
Still, coverage has advantages. You understand businesses. You know management teams. You know every comp in the sector. You can produce a 50-page market update on North American specialty valve manufacturers before breakfast.
You are functionally useless to 99.9% of society.
But to the remaining 0.1%, you are lethal.
Years later, you make VP. A new analyst joins the group. He is 22, optimistic, and still has hobbies. He asks whether coverage is a good place to start.
You look at him the way a coal miner looks at his son before sending him underground, then you smile.
“You really learn the industry.”
He nods.
He believes you.
Coverage banking is paradise.
Chefs kiss
can confirm
Lol for my search fund final project I had to write a report on the industrial stormwater compliance industry
Solid. Nicely done.
A
Banks with seperate M&A teams seem like hell
Isnt that almost every bank?
Effectively it's mostly a couple BB's? Most notably BofA/Citi/UBS/MS(?). Most EB's will do inhouse M&A and so will GS/Barc. JPM has a dedicated M&A group but cov will still run models in many cases given the size of M&A group. Some other banks with big analyst classes like JEF, WF, RBC also have but they won't run all M&A processes.
Obviously this is all group dependent as well, FIG/O&G/PU&I/REGAL/parts of HC+TMT will probably all be doing their own models.
A lot of teams have folded their M&A product teams, as far as I know. Some banks still have them but only use them for large public to publics.
Not sure how this works in the U.S.but think it would be quite odd for the M&A team to hold the pen on the model vis-à-vis the coverage team in London. We do use M&A but so they can oversee the process-related shenanigans like the UK Takeover Code. Otherwise, great post, had a laugh.
Yup, it's literally like in a cuckhold relationship. You spend months courting a client, servicing their bs asks endlessly, preparing dozens of "Discussion Materials" with no real end in sight. Then triumphantly, your team actually lands a mandate, only for the coverage seniors to parachute in the M&A deal team to take all the cool and exciting modelling/valuation work while you're stuck in PPT for the 1,823th time. I love coverage.
You spend two weeks preparing 94 pages laying out every conceivable option: sell-side, buy-side, spin, recap, JV, minority raise, partnership, strategic review, do nothing. The client selects the final option.
I love everything about these two sentences.
It’s subtle, but I love how strategic review is one of the options when the deck is already boiling the ocean. That is peak coverage
Now imagine doing M&A at UBS, where the entire team is depressed from nonstop work on “high probability mandates” and endless VDR management. We all want to die
Excuse me, I know exactly why my gf left me: she couldn’t stand how nice I was and I listened to her too much.
Is it really cooked if ur coverage team doesn't model?
Yes - good luck buyside recruiting when you didn't do anything material on your deals
How'd ur buyside recruiting go M&A Associate 1?
Accurate af.
Only caveat is if you do some in-house M&A, then for those banks being an M&A junior sucks as you get all the bitchwork from the coverage teams.
I worked at an EB with an M&A team, but on a coverage group I still built full sell-side models / LBOs for pitches that turned into mandates. For those deals the M&A team was brought in, they had to learn how to do very complex modelling in a foreign industry and were tasked with horrendous things like VDR set-up and management.
Our M&A team is like that except they keep trying to encroach on the more interesting stuff. Had a situation a year ago at my bank where they tried to start holding the pen on modelling and valuation work and ended up churning out such generic, FactSet driven shit that I insisted on bringing it all back in to my sector. Stay in your lane and get back to sorting out Datasite SoWs
Can you really call yourself a coverage banker as a junior when the M&A team does all the real work?
Coverage with no M&A team >>>
Skill issue
“You briefly consider killing yourself” real shit
This is exceptionally good writing. Obviously also hilarious
Dignissimos quia aut voluptatum et dolorum. Dolorem velit tenetur in ratione. Voluptatem nulla molestias autem eligendi est repellat. Magni omnis vel labore ad sit.
Odio dolor ut debitis error amet quo quo. Maiores quo officiis reiciendis iste rerum. Eaque rerum quisquam amet eius veritatis laudantium molestiae sit. Veniam et veniam ad magnam. Unde delectus dignissimos blanditiis et voluptate. Perferendis facere aperiam et enim.
Minima sit soluta non at necessitatibus. Et et et fugit ipsum dolorum laudantium. Quaerat et aut alias modi.
Quos ratione nisi delectus asperiores. Odio at odit necessitatibus qui dignissimos et error. Vitae non iure aspernatur fuga sit. Eum laborum corporis quas adipisci. Nemo ut ipsa vel neque sint neque sed. Voluptatem odit et eos aperiam. Maiores magni perspiciatis repellendus doloribus perferendis ut animi natus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Pariatur dolor non est molestiae. Qui nobis eius delectus rerum tempora nostrum ducimus. Et unde ullam quam suscipit facilis esse quis. Et laborum saepe beatae sunt eos ad minima omnis. Culpa doloremque ut quidem itaque modi illo. Fugiat dolor et expedita.
Enim temporibus quidem laboriosam qui et aut. Deserunt repellendus iste delectus inventore velit magnam consequatur.
Sequi amet nesciunt et. Repellendus eaque qui ea et tenetur sint iure. Voluptatum fugiat magni repellat placeat et et deleniti incidunt. Ea non minus qui aut enim ut.