Request for Mods: Consider adding a Restructuring forum?

Hi Mods & Monkeys,

Long-time lurker, occasional poster, overall huge fan of the WSO community (including the trolls who provide oft-needed lols).

WSO has dedicated spaces for IB, PE, HF, RE, CO, TR, AM, ER, and CF. I think now would be a great time to create a space for RX.

  • Restructuring recruiting and questions are unique from typical IB recruiting questions, having them in a single place would be helpful for prospects and current professionals

  • A dedicated RX forum would capture discussions in a single place which are currently scattered across IB (Restructuring banking), Consulting (RX consulting, e.g. Alix, FTI), HF (distressed credit investing), PE (distressed PE, turnarounds, Loan-to-own).

  • This is a unique time where RX banks and distressed funds are one of the few pockets actively recruiting, both on-cycle and off-cycle

  • Benefit to consolidating information: RX banker may have answers to questions posted in HF (regarding distressed funds) or CO (RX consulting); these questions may go otherwise unanswered of RX banker primarily resides in IB forum

@ Monkeys - if you agree this would help, maybe we can get a petition going to make this happen

Cheers

 
Most Helpful

Bruh rx / distressed is a small, small world. There’s not an ECM forum, a levfin forum, a software forum, or a macro investing forum. Those are all way bigger spaces than rx

RX seems to be the hot thing now among 18 year olds because we’re in a recession, but that will change sooner than you realize.

Do you understand that rx is covered within the ib forum just like all other product and coverage groups are?

 

I'd argue that rx/distressed is a meaningful and distinct enough universe to warrant its own forum.

Indeed rx is trending now, but recruiting for rx has been fairly steady over the recent years. Even in healthy markets, companies with stretched balance sheets may need to restructure, creating an opportunity set for rx consultants, distressed HF's, and turnaround PE firms.

The difference between rx/distressed and groups you mentioned is that there is overlap between IB, CO, HF, and PE discussion topics and recruiting questions. Examples just from recent posts:

2020 Update: recounting my experiences in PE and sharing thoughts on recent deals at https://leverup.substack.com
 

RX isn’t exclusive to IB. Missing the point.

Read the post again. Encompasses multiple forums, RX consulting (myself so I am biased), distressed HF/PE, RX IB.

Although, it is similar to industry/coverage, the space has significantly different skill sets than the average IB, PE/HF, and consultant.

Another point, it would be good to have a forum where people can go for legal perspectives which RX is notorious for.

 

Sorry to burst your bubble, but I work in rx and agree with the comment. Yes, rx hiring is pretty stable. Yes it’s very interesting, and, in my (very very biased) opinion, the coolest group/space to be in. But, the groups are incredibly small compared to others. Analyst classes in nyc rarely exceed 10 except at 1-2 places, where they never exceed 15. Other locations (with exception of laz Chicago) will hire 1-2 max. Often, the entire classes are less than 5. So what that means, is that in the entire US there are likely less than 100 new rx analysts each year. Turnaround consulting even smaller. For the hf folks, there is very very little chance they would be coming here often for advice. They are way too smart to listen to high schoolers give “advice”

So, It would be ridiculous to create an entire forum for

 

idk why ppl are taking this personally. I just suggested a way to organize posts based on content similarity and target audience.

Agree that it’s a much smaller audience. My reason for posting was to see what the community thought, so appreciate ya’ll’s input.

2020 Update: recounting my experiences in PE and sharing thoughts on recent deals at https://leverup.substack.com
 

What is the drawback to having a separate forum that has relatively fewer posts than IB, PE? There are clearly forums that currently exist with fewer posts, and I don't think people would necessarily want to get rid of them (they serve a purpose). The purpose is to centralize discussion and build communities.

For perspective, look at FASH with 19 pages or CF with 46 pages. Over time, I do see RX/Distressed/Special Sits/Turnaround forum exceeding 19 pages and would probably have a lot more "synergies" as the OP was describing vs. FASH and CF.

IB: 731 pages of posts PE: 123 pages HF: 68 pages RE: 96 pages CO 128 pages TR: 139 pages AM: 83 pages ER: 48 pages CF: 46 pages JOB: 197 pages BSCH: 110 pages OFF: 200 pages FASH: 19 pages

 

Dude shut up lmao. I just wrapped up my SA at a top RSSG shop and still think this is stupid. We had 8 other analysts and honestly the space isn't expanding as much as people write on this forum. Dealflow was steady and slowly growing but next year they're expecting a smaller class even... RX is a niche area even if it can be seen in distressed funds. There are so many other things that need to have their own forum first, like VC (which is a million times bigger) before RX gets one

 

If you wanna make the case and try to rally support for a separate VC sub-forum you should go for it!

2020 Update: recounting my experiences in PE and sharing thoughts on recent deals at https://leverup.substack.com
 

Lol @ the negativity from these RX SAs at this request...they scared that RX won't be so elusive and prestigious anymore once it has its own forum on WSO.

 

Definitely sounds intriguing to make a new forum dedicated just to RX. Sure it has many similarities with other forums, but there’s always overlap between many existing forums from what I’ve seen. This would be a much more niche forum from what i would imagine, and there are plenty of differences you wouldn’t find elsewhere on here.

Just my two cents.

 

Would really appreciate an rx forum - it would be extremely helpful to get a better understanding of exit opps, groups and recruiting resources. Doesn't seem like there's any harm associated with creating an extra forum....

 

Qui et vero sint quod adipisci eligendi quo. At tenetur magnam dignissimos quia qui nemo eligendi. Ducimus sit ut consequatur provident necessitatibus recusandae dolorem et. Magni est vero quos sed illum architecto veritatis. Ipsam facere occaecati est alias quia in.

At et quia labore id voluptate eos. Omnis placeat velit aspernatur id similique in molestiae optio. Ex nihil aut fugit iusto quia porro molestias.

Est quidem rerum velit nam eum ex. Ut alias facilis quasi voluptatem voluptatum ea quia. Quibusdam velit aut est non.

Velit tempore et velit ut. Est nam aut incidunt molestiae.

 

Veritatis tempora quaerat quis aut omnis. Distinctio ullam accusamus voluptate dolore reiciendis. Occaecati ipsam error suscipit aliquam ullam aut. Minus dolorem temporibus quia voluptas. Pariatur quidem similique aut atque est soluta. Quod nihil temporibus vitae laboriosam provident sit dolores. Aut quaerat tempora odio molestias non.

Nostrum aspernatur magni et sapiente vel. At ut nobis modi. Optio eos doloribus consequuntur sit cumque. Porro aut quia voluptas recusandae tenetur. Debitis corrupti iste sit nihil omnis. Accusantium eaque omnis facilis iste tempora eos.

 

Quaerat quibusdam porro officia sunt quos voluptate. Consectetur provident aut nam ipsum. Sint voluptatem rerum et fugiat non fuga. Incidunt non ut et cum fugiat aut et. Ratione perferendis autem ea dolores quia.

Voluptatum recusandae nesciunt dolor at quod velit maiores. Mollitia voluptatem facilis tempore beatae est magni consectetur. Doloremque qui asperiores earum rerum. Illo omnis magnam et qui. Veritatis velit quo est unde cumque magni eveniet consequatur. Eligendi quis odit hic enim rerum vitae. Doloribus sed accusantium est voluptas enim.

Magni ex est veniam quaerat consequatur doloremque autem. Mollitia voluptates facere possimus adipisci. Dolorem asperiores accusamus vel culpa officia sunt. Necessitatibus earum et eum explicabo non qui. Minima laboriosam mollitia et cupiditate. Aliquam modi dolorum error ab odio dignissimos. Velit itaque quia aut.

Praesentium odit dolor est ad dicta impedit. Velit eos ut optio doloribus molestiae laudantium ab ullam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”