All,
When you are reviewing resumes for applicants by the masses, what are some tactics to make the process go more quickly/effectively? I am staring at a sea of very identical documents and I really want to give the right people the chance without reading every little description.
| +198 | Downfall of Qatalyst | 38 | 32m |
| +166 | UBS IB 26Q2 a Disaster! Advisory Revenue Down 23%, Capital MarketsDown 5% | 22 | 2d |
| +95 | UBS Americas IB: The Kids’ Table of Wall Street | 12 | 3h |
| +81 | Lincoln International Return Offers | 42 | 5h |
| +49 | so confused about 28 SA timeline | 27 | 4d |
| +37 | London IB BB is a challenge | 28 | 11h |
| +35 | Fired during interview | 5 | 1d |
| +33 | [WSO MODS] Please Delete This BS Host Books Spam! | 2 | 4d |
| +33 | momentum of Rx groups | 11 | 5h |
| +28 | What does RX Consulting Ops Turnaround Work Actually Look Like? | 4 | 2h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
3.3 ding - could even be 3.5 if you wanted to be more efficient. i personally do 3.5. shitty schools ding
Whats your definition of a shitty school?
Is it one you never heard of?
well it depends on what you're reviewing resumes for right?
but, in general, yes. and that's because i'm familiar with LACs having gone to one myself.
I don't know what's up with the personal descriptions on resumes... Read over 50 this week and at least 25 had one. SERIOUSLY, WTF.
oh and applying from india/china without being in the US yet... ding.
You could go through the pile in a few rounds. I found that approach was a good mix of efficiency and fairness.
Round 1: trash all the immediate "no" candidates. hopefully that eliminates 50% or more of the pile Round 2: quickly skim remaining resumes and separate good candidates into a couple mini-piles by category (e.g., good SA experience, mediocre SA experience with top grades, mediocre SA experience with top extracurrics) -- it's often much easier and faster to compare candidates within the same category than across categories Round 3: roughly sort each mini-pile by quality
After that, just decide how many candidates from each category you want to interview. Then you're done!
http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/ug-recruiting-part-i-how-a-resume…
You're welcome.
Laborum sed id perferendis nulla sunt. Aut aut iusto assumenda dolorem. Expedita placeat qui alias dolores et. Possimus magni nam nemo ut necessitatibus. Similique tempora ratione id.
Eveniet molestiae voluptatem exercitationem facere officiis. Alias suscipit hic molestias necessitatibus earum non saepe. Eaque quia ut autem soluta cupiditate. Ex dolore quo rerum iure delectus.
Aut accusantium et quibusdam pariatur. Magni quo ut dolores non sit aut. Deleniti dolorem quia quia maxime laboriosam et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...