50 Comments
 

WF here, Robinhood not allowed. I use TD Ameritrade and have to clear all trades through an internal system. We have a restricted list with specific requirements for securities involved in active / recently closed mandates. Additionally, we're not allowed to buy / sell names in our coverage group, but can buy names in other coverage groups if we don't have access to MNPI. We can trade in a name in our coverage group as long as they're not a client. All equity purchases require a 30 day minimum hold. ETF's do not require a 30 day minimum hold or prior approval. Ex: I can day trade SPY options if i wanted to without pre-clearing, though it'd probably be a terrible idea trying to balance work with day trading.

 

Single names are a no (or heavily restricted at some banks). But since your biotech and industrials ETFs aren’t single stocks then they’re a maybe. ETF in your coverage area should be a no and even if not a definite no then I wouldn’t fuck with them. Also, notice the mention of broad-based - it can’t be an ETF with like 10 stocks in it. Same principle of MNPI, conflicts of interest, etc. You have MNPI on a single name in a 10 stock ETF is different than having MNPI on a single name in SPY

Some banks may let you trade single names but you’ll have to get it cleared and checked against restricted lists and other shit

 

Idk Bud Fox probably the SEC...

First of all MNPI isn’t just laying around like pack of skittles. So don’t make it out to be as if endless company “secrets” are just at the average Joe’s disposal. This leads to second layer.

The second layer is enforcement and involves SEC algos (just use a basic IF statement for an account as green as your friend), whistleblower complaint incentives ($$), tip from the pissed off trade counterparty you raked over the coals, etc.

If it was easy and you could get away with it, everybody would do it. I think the first part is more important than the enforcement aspect. At the end of the day, MNPI is hard to come by and eventually it becomes public. That window of time to act unlawfully becomes fairly straight forward to monitor, especially for accounts who do not trade frequently (your “friend”) and the recent large data advancements in technology/AI.

 

That IF statement is exactly how easy it is to find suspicious activity. If a stock went up a lot due to MNPI, a simple IF statement regarding any new accounts that solely invested in this stock all of a sudden or a massive investment the day before the release of the info (or a few days before to be safe) would yield a lot of suspicious accounts.

 

Check with your local bnk tha tyou work at.

Will update my computer soon and leave Incognito so I will disappear forever. How did I achieve Neanderthal by trolling? Some people are after me so need to close account for safety.
 

Strangely, FX trading is totally kosher where I’m at

$500 position in Zoom needs paperwork but a $100,000 bet against the dollar? Go for it.

Get busy living
 

So if I have money in Vanguard funds at Vanguard in a Roth IRA, and say Vanguard isn't on the list of approved brokers, I'd have to roll the account over elsewhere??? Seems unnecessary

 

Rem aut voluptatem molestias aut similique qui et. Consequatur omnis aut ea quod. Voluptatem qui nihil omnis officiis id maxime aspernatur adipisci. Repellat autem sed natus.

Labore quo omnis qui tempore eos reprehenderit. Dolores omnis nihil eos id ut autem quia. Fugit omnis commodi mollitia ea minima. Enim minus nobis ut id et.

Doloribus velit a repellendus. Quia sit quidem sint et repellendus aut sit nesciunt. Molestias laboriosam earum ut id dolorem et.

 

Maxime fugiat officia molestiae repellendus non expedita autem. Nihil provident porro ea quis ad minima quasi. Ut id non molestiae quas. Aliquam sequi id iste. Et explicabo eos consequatur voluptatem.

Odio veritatis sed aliquam et consequatur. Rerum impedit atque vitae sapiente illum quod. Tenetur natus occaecati ipsam quo quas.

Et veniam et eum veritatis quis velit cumque. Porro repudiandae dolorum est velit itaque. Qui deserunt incidunt quod ducimus sit mollitia similique. Est voluptate consequatur ut temporibus aut. Sit blanditiis quo id explicabo similique necessitatibus itaque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”