Seeking advice on job decision: IB vs non-IB
Hey all,
I've been in insurance/ asset management corp dev straight out of college (top 5 school in the US). It's a top insurance brand and offers good exits but it hasn't been enough to land me an investment role in a long-only shop or L/S shop, which is my long term goal.
However, I did manage to land the following roles:
- Top 10 FIG IB (Analyst)
- Insurance Product Management role at a top PE backed firm
- Elite FIG boutique IB (Analyst)
There are many personal variables in consideration here (location, WLB, stability) but would value your thoughts on the following: should I take the FIG IB opportunity for a couple of years to eventually transition to a buy side opportunity, how easy would it be to transition to a LO/ LS hedge fund role (I do not want to do PE in an investment capacity as many are just sweatshops and hedge funds are just more my type)? For many personal variables, I do find the product role compelling as it may open fundraising roles / product roles within PE shops down the road.
Thanks!
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a breakdown of your options and how they align with your long-term goal of transitioning to a long-only (LO) or long/short (L/S) hedge fund role:
1. Top 5 FIG IB (Analyst)
2. Insurance Product Management Role (PE-Backed Firm)
3. Elite Boutique IB (Analyst)
Key Considerations:
Recommendation:
Take the Top 5 FIG IB Analyst role if your primary goal is to transition to a hedge fund. It offers the best combination of prestige, skill development, and network to position you for LO or L/S opportunities. If WLB or stability is a higher priority, the product management role could be a good alternative, but it will likely require a pivot later to align with your hedge fund aspirations.
Sources: Breakdown of Post-IB Exit Opportunities, Breakdown of Post-IB Exit Opportunities, An old man looking for advice
Please do not choose IB. I did and I had to replace my entire toilet and plumbing system 3 times.
This is an oddly specific comment haha, looks like you're still in IB yourself however
FIG is a pretty specific coverage. With a background in insurance you will probably get put in the insurance vertical, which will limit exit ops (along with banks) since it's such a specific way of modeling. I would diligence exits and see where your specific group has placed.
If you want LO/LS you should really be recruiting for equity research. Your background would be interesting to the sellside folks who cover AMs.
Also, HF is not any less of a sweatshop than PE. Maybe less hours, but far more pressure during those hours. Most people in HF are fired several times in their career, while PE is a very stable job.
Thank you, very helpful. You're right, I'll be joining the insurance vertical amid the life - AM convergence. I also stand corrected, I think it's more of a top 10 FIG group so exits are MM-ish. Equity research openings are just so hard to come by. For a given chance would you recommend a Real estate stint over FIG? I did have a verbal from a similar calibre real estate group? Will probably lead to REPE opps at the very least
REPE is a very different career from LO/LS and once you're in RE it can be hard to get out.
I would spend some time thinking about what you actually want longer-term and aligning your near-term steps to get there
3 is obvious solution no?
Yeah I understand why it would look like that. Not to give it away but they're building their US reputation only recently
are you sure EB term applies to them then? If this is something like Rothschild in US I would definitely take fig over it. You can get great generalist ops from GS/JPM/MS FIG, and still have generalist from Citi bofa
Sit ut vitae odio explicabo ipsum. Sed magnam numquam autem quia. Dolores voluptatem modi nihil explicabo velit pariatur commodi. Et modi dolor perspiciatis architecto. Nostrum asperiores totam ad voluptatem occaecati laboriosam.
Dolor eum accusamus deleniti omnis. Doloribus quisquam sed quia laboriosam iusto. Autem quia autem molestias quaerat a vitae necessitatibus in. Excepturi dolor culpa animi ea ipsa. Enim repellat id ea saepe non omnis.
Aut praesentium maiores necessitatibus. Voluptatem corrupti maxime asperiores repellat. Voluptates numquam sed voluptatem asperiores ipsum. Fugit sint nihil voluptate est. Necessitatibus libero harum voluptate.
Non minus aut aut consequatur laborum est. Beatae sit dicta ut unde. Cum quasi aut ratione sit illum aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...