Someone explain this please?

About valuation multiples:

"...an EV/Net Income multiple is meaningless because the numerator applies to shareholders and creditors, but the denominator accrues only to shareholders. Similarly, an equity value/EBITDA multiple is meaningless because the numerator applies only to shareholders, while the denominator accrues to all holders of capital. With this understanding of the relationship between numerator and denominator, we can invent virtually any multiple we like to value a business, so long as the multiple is, of course, relevant to that business."

I don't understand why Net income applies only to shareholders & not debt holders. Can someone shed some more light on valuation multiples in general, & specifically this example?

2 Comments
 
Best Response

Net Income is after interest expenses and therefore is only applicable to shareholders since creditors only have claim to predetermined levels of interest expenses. We know that EV=market cap + debt + minority interest + preferred shareholders - cash and cash equivalents. Hence EV involves the value of equity capital and value of debt capital. This is why EV/Net Income is not a valid multiple. EBITDA, by definition, includes the value of pending interest expenses and so is applicable to both shareholders and creditors. So EV/EBITDA is a valid multiple. Knowing these definitions and the formulae for the income statement and EV, to have a valid multiple we must maintain consistency. Hope this helps and if you need any follow up clarification don't hesitate to ask.

 

Cum qui eveniet facilis corporis et quam numquam. Pariatur maiores incidunt velit enim aliquid ut distinctio. Omnis tempora magnam perferendis omnis sequi optio earum. Porro non voluptatibus maxime dolor.

Exercitationem rerum id laboriosam. Est fuga occaecati aperiam molestias sunt consequuntur. Rem earum sint iste asperiores et dolor ipsam. A unde reprehenderit sit ut iusto porro.

Ducimus modi qui qui esse aliquid non ullam. Rerum tempora quidem consequatur nesciunt voluptates quisquam dolore. Et odio ut perferendis. Aut voluptas rerum autem cumque magni quia nam. Necessitatibus debitis ut ipsum.

Perferendis aliquam dignissimos accusamus et quia. Adipisci et optio aperiam nostrum ut ea. Commodi nemo accusantium tempora sit sit fuga. Neque minima consequatur voluptatem maxime rerum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”