Suited Assessments Tips - Logical Reasoning

Hi all,

I'm wondering if anyone has any suggestions for the Suited logical reasoning assessment. I'm not familiar with the format but believe it presents pairs of axioms/statements from which you have to assess if a given scenario is always true, sometimes true, or never true.

I've looked into some logical reasoning laws (e.g. contrapositives) but am wondering if anyone has any advice on preparing for such tests in general?

Thank you!

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

I did the Suited and was able to finish all of the questions for logical reasoning. If you know the logical proofs, it should be fairly easy. Start with learning what a contrapositive is. It's basically the only logical equivalent of a statement. Anything else is either false or uncertain.

Let's take the statement if a-> b. The only true equivalent statement is if not b-> not a. An example might be helpful. Take the statement: If you've been to the White House, you've been to Washington DC. a is going to White House, and b is having been in Washington DC. If not b-> not a would be if you haven't been to Washington DC, you haven't been to the White House. This is an unequivocally true statement.

If b->a is uncertain. Let's use the Washington DC example again. The equivalent would be if you've been to washington DC, you've been to the White House. This statement is uncertain because you could go to Washington DC and visit the White House, but you also may not.

The key logical rules to know when given a statement in the if a-> b format:

Either b or not a= True

If not b-> not a= True

If b-> a= Uncertain

If not a-> not b= Uncertain

If a-> not b= False

If not b-> a= False

Try running through these rules using the Washington DC example and that should make it more clear. If you're able to identify the a and b of the original statement and see which rule the sub statement falls under, you should be able to do the questions quickly. This was how I finished all 40 questions in the low time limit. Granted, you probably don't need to even finish the test, as most people won't. I also don't think the test matters at all because I'm pretty sure I aced it and still never got an interview at William Blair, which used it. People told me in their interview invite it said to finish the test if they hadn't already, indicating that Suited wasn't used for making applicant decisions. Kinda sucks because I prepared for it and did really well.

 

Eos autem quia dolorem in doloremque similique atque. Saepe rerum saepe tempore atque. Nisi perspiciatis consequuntur quis error quod possimus adipisci. Aut similique ut iste facilis asperiores voluptatum. Eum a ipsa velit expedita.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (50) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”