Svb Leerink thoughts
Been seeing a ton of SVB Leerink comments lately. Any thoughts on their outlook? Is this a place you would want to be?
Been seeing a ton of SVB Leerink comments lately. Any thoughts on their outlook? Is this a place you would want to be?
| +313 | UBS Tech MD hires Son (from no-name college) as an Intern | 54 | 1h |
| +89 | [Official] 2026 IB Analyst Bonus Megathread (with 2025 Consolidated Pay and Perks/Benefits) | 12 | 1d |
| +52 | Is DCM actually underrated ? | 18 | 7h |
| +46 | Are all Tech / TMT groups sweaty? | 31 | 7h |
| +41 | UBS Groups Ranked by Future Outlook | 20 | 4d |
| +40 | JPM M&A is Gone??? Purely Coverage Banking??? | 20 | 7h |
| +37 | Am I behind? 31 Year Old Analyst | 10 | 10h |
| +32 | UVA McIntire vs Cornell Dyson for IB | 19 | 3d |
| +32 | Losing my personality in Banking | 5 | 22h |
| +31 | Incoming IB Analyst: Best Ways to Prepare? | 8 | 22h |
Career Resources
My gosh, the amount of posts on this is crazy. Yes they acquired a good HC bank and a bunch of good tech bankers. Personally think they are kinda late to tech but whatever, I’m sure they’ll do well. A lot is TBD. What else is there to say?
Agree with the “late to tech” comment.
Especially considering how concentrated tech market share is among GS/MS/Q you either really need to own a niche they don’t dominate (MM deal values) or poach their bankers (unlikely)
They've been on a hiring spree and the HC team just hired the Co-head of HC M&A from Barclays. Definitely seems to be a place that is growing fast
You couldn’t….read all the comments you referenced where this is discussed ad nauseam? Needed a thread of your own?
Correct. Hope the pot of shot you had for dinner tasted great
Bump. Would like to learn more about Svb
If I’m a prospect/intern, I really don’t give much value to the “growing fast, rising” argument if you’re going to the buy side in 2 years. Would probably be much better off at an already-established name.
for an a2a hopeful, yeah, value in the upside
SVB has literally all tech and life science clients currently so they're definitely not late to the game. The reality is over the last couple decades, SVB constantly loses the clients they helped bring up from the pre-revenue stage immediately once they grow into IPO / Later stage companies. With the growing corporate banking team, m&a advisory/LevFin/Cap Markets/ER groups, the play here is for SVB to be a one stop shop for startups AND sponsors all the way from the beginning when they just need credit cards and runway extension products all the way to when they get big enough to needing large-scale revolvers, acquisition financing, and advisory 5-10 years down the road. ~2/3s of tech/life science companies that IPO'd the last couple years banked with SVB at some level. How many founders of those companies would choose to stick with the bankers that have supported them since the beginning than leave for GS/MS if SVB DID have the capabilities to do what the big boys do? I don't know the answer but the synergies and pipeline are definitely in place so it's worth trying. SVB did shutter it's old IB practice in the mid 2000s so who knows if history repeats itself or not.
Disclaimer: I work at SVB. I don't get paid nearly as much as what the Leerink guys will get paid so I don't really care too much, but it's nice being at a company that is making some waves
Cool to see them expand into tech and poach the UBS bankers (which I believe is one of the better groups at UBS). That definitely helps their rep and if you go there youll get dealflow at a reputable shop with at least some exit options in PE and others available to you like any other non-EB boutique like FT Partners, MTS Health Partners, Cain, Marathon, etc. (HC-specific opps if you go that route as them and MTS are known as banks for HC nerds only, maybe a bit more optionality on the tech side).
From the HC deals they had before this though most seem mostly lower middle market maybe middle market at best, but maybe that is just because of how smaller drugs get acquired up by medium players then the medium players get acquired by the big players before any of these things even come to market. We will need to see what tech deals they close before we can really make an assessment there.
Want to give some actual context on this discussion not from a college kid who signed an internship offer here…
The facts: SVB bought Leerink a few years back, SVB is big bank without IB and Leerink is a healthcare boutique. Goal was to combine financing side of SVB with advisory side of Leerink. Would say this was reasonably successful, SVB Leerink has done well on the HC side, they do a lot of mandates but aren’t a market leader by any means (the whole “SVB is an EB” stuff is insane).
Recently poached a bunch of tech bankers from UBS and other places and bought a tech ER shop. This is all very recent so anyone trying to give you a definitive answer on what it means is making stuff up - much is still yet to be seen.
My thoughts:
This is massively overhyped on this site. They’re a solid healthcare shop but not competitive with an EB/BB by any means. On the tech side, hiring BB tech bankers doesn’t automatically make you competitive with BBs, it takes years for that transition to have an impact, especially when you need to hire a new junior team and built out the entire industry group.
Does anyone here truly think hiring a few UBS seniors means SVB tech > UBS tech now? Like someone else here mentioned, you’ll be gone in 2 years as an analyst, and it takes much longer than 2 years to get a new group running and even longer for the reputation to catch up. Headhunters aren’t crossing out UBS TMT from their client list to replace with SVB.
Long term, think there is opportunity here. In 5-10 years will SVB be a BB? It’s possible, they have a lot of the financing capabilities and are showing a willingness to poach senior talent. If I wanted to be a senior banker, think you can make a case that they’re a good shop to start your career given growing firm, but this is a pretty small minority of people reading this.
So overall, SVB is making moves but wouldn’t say anything is proven yet and will take a few years before reputation catches up. Lots of hype here from incoming summer analysts, but think people need to take it with a grain of salt.
They just hired Goldman’s co head of TMT and credit suisse’s co head of TMT? It’s more than UBS. Barclays co head of HC was hired just last week.
Jefferies vs. SVBL?
jefferies
I would go Jefferies.
Would y’all say that regardless of location?
Expedita itaque molestiae consequatur ut aut voluptatem. Vel qui nulla officiis et ab eveniet.
Praesentium saepe sed et sit commodi et et. Veniam consequatur quos accusamus ab possimus veniam asperiores dolores.
Et et corrupti eos quas doloribus neque. Tempora quo expedita optio et. Libero maxime aut voluptas voluptatem dolore voluptatem. Sit quis non veritatis amet amet non. Facilis aut vero ex rerum omnis modi. Aperiam neque nihil odit qui eligendi cumque.
Autem facere ab et esse ut recusandae et. Cum sed enim et error voluptas. Quisquam recusandae voluptas fuga facilis amet. Perferendis quod dolor rerum neque esse impedit suscipit. Ad enim dignissimos odit velit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...