Swiss Banks and IB

Just out of curiosity, when Swiss banks talk about downsizing investment banking activities do they primarily refer to the sales and trading arms of the investment bank or does this extend to the services/advisory segment as well (M&A)?Also, historically, why have the Swiss not been successful in that aspect of banking/ignored developing IB arms? 

5 Comments
 
Most Helpful

To answer the second part first, the Swiss have historically focused on IB. Both UBS and CS built out powerhouse IB practices through acquisitions, and pre-GFC UBS and CS had among the two most respected IB divisions out there. Just look at how many of today's top names in IB worked at UBS or CS. However, those acquisitions also arguably laid the groundwork for the downfall of the Swiss banks. The first issue was culture; historically, top management at the two large Swiss banks have been relatively conservative and risk-adverse, and the acquisitions made by UBS and CS (especially CS) were of firms that largely embraced risk in chasing profits that often brought the American-led IB sides and the suits in Zurich to conflict. Whereas at UBS, calls came to start downsizing IB in favor of its core PWM operations came as soon as the mid-2000s, under John Mack CS focused more and more on its IB division. While UBS took a hard hit from the GFC, UBS has reigned in its IB division's risk-taking culture substantially over the past decade in favor of focusing on its businesses, the DLJ and First Boston influence among CS's ranks has led to a substantially less conservative culture.

Another consequence of the Swiss banks' forays into IB is a loss in reputation for Swiss banking secrecy. With all the acquisitions made to bolster presence in the US (and especially with UBS's takeover of PaineWebber), the integration of onshore and offshore businesses provided US authorities with substantially more influence to crack down on Swiss banking secrecy through tax evasions and sanctions enforcement means, and substantially hurt the PWM reputations of both banks by forcing the banks to comply more with US laws and send confidential client information to the US.

To answer the first part of your question, all of IBD will likely be downsized, but the S&T arm will likely face the brunt of downsizing. There's still synergies to be had with advisory (UBS has maintained a sizeable advisory presence while downsizing financing and S&T-related activities as the firm uses its advisory business to be augment its offerings and be a one-stop-shop for UHNW clients and their companies). That being said, considering how much overlap in client coverage the advisory segment faces and the likely reduction in auxiliary services that also boost advisory deal flow (the rest of IB), advisory will still likely face substantial cuts.

 

Makes sense. Do you think advisory cuts will come from higher ups or junior positions? Are intern cuts also fair game?

Unfortunately, juniors will face more of the cuts. They are less valuable and are in greater numbers. Banks have a continuous talent pipeline for junior talent and cutting senior bankers and bringing in Analysts or Associates wont be contributing to UBS' revenue. Most of the industry wide layoffs we have seen over the past 6 months have impacted more juniors than seniors. I expect this to remain true, especially in a forced merger of two similar banks.

 

Sint in corrupti rem velit ducimus. Tempora sed ea quas incidunt. Quos modi ea sint ut ut. Eius nobis numquam veniam possimus illum rem. Praesentium at tempore qui maiores omnis id. A quidem temporibus recusandae.

Ut harum maxime laborum. Quos doloribus nam non. Aut voluptatem in sit ea est nihil eaque.

Nisi alias consequatur ut vel quia placeat. Nemo quia aut qui iusto sunt aut quibusdam. Consequatur at facere dolor natus aliquid ut velit.

Quibusdam expedita eum dolor incidunt aut. Soluta consequatur consequatur deserunt amet. Voluptatem est est accusantium doloribus voluptas et provident. Assumenda fuga iusto suscipit dignissimos impedit voluptas molestias quo.

hardstuck in IB

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”