technical: equity cushion calculation

Hi fellow monkeys

having some difficulty understanding the equity cushion calculation, normally, people calculate it as:

[1 - (debt/ebitda / ev/ebitda)] = equity cushion, this equation can be simplified to [1 - (debt/EV)]

however, my problem is that EV subtracts cash out of the equation.

Imagine two scenarios, CompanyA and CompanyB

CompanyA has a Mkt cap of 100, and Cash of 100, and Debt of 500
CompanyB has a Mkt cap of 100, and Cash of 0, and Debt of 500

CompanyA's EV is 500, and equity cushion is 0
CompanyB's EV is 600, and equity cushion is 16.67%

Okay so CompanyB has a higher equity cushion, but is this really the case?

Lets take a look, first, we note that CompanyB's value completely lies in the business, the business is worth 600, and therefore, if the value of the business is impaired by 16.67%, the business is worth 500, just the amount to cover the debt. Goods good here.

But, if we look at CompanyA, we note that the value of CompanyA lies in the business and cash. The business of CompanyA itself is worth 500, hence EV of 500, but there is 100 of cash balance as well. So what does this mean, TO ME, it means CompanyA's business can lose 100 in value, and still cover the debt - this is contrary to the equity cushion calculated. When CompanyA's business loses 100 in value, the business is worth 400, true this would mean the debt is impaired, BUT remember we have 100 cash as well, adding it together means there is 500 in value in total at CompanyA, just enough to cover the debt. So despite the 0 equity cushion calculation, there is ACTUALLY a cushion of 100, the equity cushion of CompanyA and CompanyB is the same. (Correct?)

Can someone please tell me if I am doing something wrong here?

4 Comments
 

.

Better to look at an equity cushion in terms of turns of leverage

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 
Best Response

Sequi delectus assumenda quod possimus explicabo provident aut. Quia illo et et omnis. Dicta ab impedit dicta similique.

Those who can, do. Those who can't, post threads about how to do it on WSO.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”