The Fed and Wealth Inequality

Curious to hear different opinions on this.

I would argue that the greatest impetus for wealth inequality over the past decade has been the Fed. The top 10% of Americans by wealth own 90% of the financial assets. Unelected officials printing trillions of dollars years after the financial crisis and using that money to buy financial assets (QE) effectively taxed everyone and lined the pockets of asset holders. And it was all the more clandestine because financial assets don’t show up in CPI.

Now we’re mired in a dangerous bout of inflation rendering the Fed essentially powerless to combat an impending recession. What was Yellen thinking in ‘14? And Powell in ‘19? I thought their justification seemed idiotic at the time (“inflation is only 1.2% as opposed to our 2% target”). Lots of things can precipitate low inflation (age demographics, technology, globalization) which are not all inherently bad. A surplus of aging Baby-Boomer savers relative to borrowers was likely one factor keeping inflation down — that’s merely the natural equilibria of supply and demand and in my opinion not a symptom of economic peril (and surely 1.2% inflation should not have been viable justification to flood our economy and markets with trillions of dollars of stimulus).

Inflation is an incredibly regressive tax, and I can’t help but blame the myopia of the Fed. Paul Volcker is turning in his grave.

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Would definitely be interesting to see otherwise but hard to say without a counterfactual. It does seem however common sense that at least in the last decade you’re dead on about QE lining the pockets of the already rich asset holders. I wish there was a better comp for a large modern economy that has naturally occurring interest rates and just has central banks acting as a lender of last resort. If there is a country like this someone please enlightenment me as I haven’t spent as much time with macro as I should.

 

Reprehenderit perferendis perspiciatis quod voluptas eius libero odio. Quis nesciunt et voluptatem quod. Culpa explicabo eius culpa sed assumenda voluptatem dignissimos. Culpa quod aliquam beatae iste ex vel at.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”