Majority of the HFs are outperformed by low index funds over the course of 3-5 years . In addition to this , the high management fees and performance fees are also a matter of concern . So what is the future outlook of HFs from 15-20 years from now . Is their existence in a big question ?
| +69 | PWP acquisition by Piper cancelled | 28 | 1h |
| +61 | Is my MD a grifter? 16 years, 8 firms | 18 | 1h |
| +43 | No return offer - UPDATE. | 12 | 1d |
| +43 | "Corporate & Investment Banking" Analyst - Why? | 36 | 51m |
| +40 | Article: UBS Wall Street Rebuild Is a Study in Management Failure | 7 | 3d |
| +38 | MS / GS IBD ACs London interview processes run by nationality? | 37 | 13m |
| +29 | Lack of talent in IB! | 25 | 19h |
| +28 | What Are The Best Boutiques 2026/2027 | 16 | 20h |
| +24 | Moat of modelling in PE/Finance completely vanished; | 3 | 1d |
| +23 | Internal lateral from coverage to M&A (focused on coverage) | 10 | 1h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
In my opinion all these funds dominate in cycles. I feel like in the next 10-15 years the funds that are new now e.g (Holocene, D1,Anomaly, Skye Global) will be the faces of the HF World. As far as the Hf space as a whole,investing in the public markets will always be around. There will always be young talent willing to bet on themselves and invest in the public markets whether L/S, global macro, etc. Just my 2 cents take it with a grain of salt.
Thats highly probable. As far as I'm concerned majority of the funds will evolve into quant funds { I might be wrong } and will there be any analyst positions for non-quant portfolios , where traditional ERs/AMs guys can get in and climb the ladder way up to the PMs
In my opinion fundemental/disctretionary investing will always be around. Investing is an art not a science.
Sorry to sound juvenile but when you say “non-quant portfolios” what do you mean by this?
There will always be a demand and for top-performing hedge funds. Also, hedge funds aren't supposed to outperform the S&P500, most are ~60% long. Therefore, they should underperform in a raging bull market.
That being said there are a large number of mediocre hedge funds, and they’ll likely die off.
Do you think that the existing HFs will transition into an asset management firm , where they will hold blue chips and cash in those dividend cheques . And whats your view on QUANT FUNDS
I think it's natural for hedge funds to expand into AM once scale becomes an issue you see Bridgewater doing this.
Quant fund is a broad term. However, I repeat my comment from above, good once will stay and others will fall off.
hedge funds will probably still exist. the end of hedge funds has been literally written about for 50 years and it has not happened
the premise of your question "outperformed by index funds" is also incorrect - most funds are supposed to be hedged and many run market neutral. when you have a 15 year bull market, passive investing looks great, but tough to say whether that always holds
also most hedge funds complement index fund or mutual fund allocations to LPs - they don't necessarily replace them. an endowment isn't investing 100% of their funds into alternatives
Et et velit et eum nemo cumque. Et eaque ea voluptatem occaecati sit. Reprehenderit eos ducimus incidunt qui minus culpa quibusdam. Enim assumenda consectetur laborum occaecati. Voluptas in nam qui architecto.
A excepturi qui et et esse et repellendus. Facilis et id reprehenderit recusandae voluptatum. Aperiam dolor voluptatem voluptas perspiciatis in est. Atque blanditiis vel magni ipsa omnis ipsam ut. Error illum facere numquam earum necessitatibus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...