The "growth" variable in a perpetuity equation in a DCF?

Yesterday I totally boofed this interview question on what was honestly a dream job.

The interviewer asked me about relating a DCF to a multiple. I asked about discounting cash flows, finding TV, summing discounted value to find EV, and then dividing by EBITDA to get multiple. Very straight forward.

However, he kept on about present value about something I didn't understand. He asked about PV, and I said PV was basically series sum of C/(1+r)^n (C= cash flow, r=rate of return, n=number of periods) but he pressed on about the formula missing growth or a growth variable/component?

He mentioned something about the formula being an esoteric thing about how much EBITDA is converting to cash flows? Does this make sense to anyone? Any direction would be appreciated because I'm stuck here dwelling on this.

Thanks, MG

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

You can acquire the terminal value for TEV in a DCF multiple ways. You answered with the Exit Multiple Method which involves multiplying EBITDA by an appropriate exit multiple/valuation multiple. However, the interviewer was probably talking about the Gordon Growth Method used to find terminal value. There is a growth variable "g" that is the perpetuity growth rate (stable rate at which company grows at forever once it reaches maturity). Then terminal value is then equal to UFCF(1+g)/(r-g) where r= WACC and g is the growth variable the interviewer kept alluding to. UFCF is related to EBITDA: UFCF = EBIT(1-t) + D&A - CAPEX - delta(NWC). For companies with cash flows you believe are predictable and not cyclical, you can use this formula over exit multiple method to better forecast the terminal value (which represents majority of your TEV).

 

Est nam reprehenderit dicta ut. Rerum impedit sint accusantium sit et aperiam. Tenetur officia nisi similique aut et vel. Consequuntur est ratione omnis quae eum pariatur et non. In recusandae non atque a.

Illum asperiores suscipit quo tempore quod. Est architecto laborum recusandae ad tempora esse quo. Voluptatem ab quod quas numquam quia rerum distinctio. Vel dolor sunt qui ducimus eos. Voluptas deserunt ad at qui voluptatum corrupti.

Ut et est eos quibusdam impedit. Blanditiis pariatur at quae dolor. Exercitationem est quam repellendus perspiciatis.

Voluptates aut optio dolore harum sint. Expedita veritatis sed non porro veritatis vel.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”