The Hidden Parts of the Job
I'm graduating college (don't worry, I'm making the most of my time remaining here), and have been lucky to intern at reputable shops a few times and have a FT offer. Part of the intern education was seeing how analysts experienced life in finance (IB, AM, CB etc) from desk work to more social things. Obviously as an intern that view is still pretty shielded since you aren't with your analysts 24/7. What are the hidden parts of the job that you wish you knew coming in, the stuff that interns don't see full time folks go through / can't even register from the sort of "monkey see other monkey" intern life? Asking because the existential dread is setting in.
The hidden parts of the job that interns often don't see or fully grasp can vary, but based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some key insights:
Workload and Workflow Unpredictability:
Pressure to Perform:
Internal Politics and Dynamics:
Repetitive Tasks and Limited Modeling Opportunities:
Mental and Physical Toll:
Networking and Reputation Management:
Limited Control Over Work-Life Balance:
Learning Curve and Self-Teaching:
Feedback and Growth:
Existential Questions:
Remember, while these challenges exist, they also come with opportunities for growth, learning, and career advancement. If you're feeling the existential dread now, take time to clarify your "why" for pursuing this path—it can help you stay grounded when things get tough.
Sources: How to deal with 2nd year analysts who refuse to work, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/finance-and-the-destruction-of-human-capital?customgpt=1, 10 Random Career Life Hacks, Finishing 1st Year as HF Analyst - Ask Anything, Everything I wish I knew in Banking
Bump
Bump, great question
Bump
Probably just the politics side of things, especially with reviews and bonus discussions which can also fall during the summer cycle at some banks. Can also be a really ugly side of working with people that analysts will keep their thoughts among other FT people. I think there were many workstreams that interns did not touch and may have less visbility on that are a totally different experience full-time like holding pen on a complex model, etc. since at my BB most interns will probably be doing a lot of comps / benchmarking pages, creating profiles, etc.
Not a single intern, let alone most first year analysts, are holding the pen on a model for a live deal. Especially not a complex one. Congrats on Jefferies bro.
What are you talking about. Did someone delete their comment
Doing good work is way more important than “being social” lol. For the analysts who suck all the VP’s balls and try to get noticed, if u suck at the job, that’s what matters. People don’t want small talk about your weekend or a sports game - they want results. I spend all my time doing better work and less dicking around in the bullpen now and my reviews are much higher
Performance is very political / not merit based until MD. The only people who truly make a difference to a bank’s bottom line are the top ~5% of MDs who originate real deals.
The rest of the team is essentially replaceable and pushing paper, more or less. Mid/bad MDs latch onto capital markets fees (or bring in nothing at all). VPs and Ds play a big role in execution, but the difference between an A+ execution and satisfactory B execution is de minimis to clients.
To get good reviews at the junior/mid levels, be “good enough” at the job and be likable. Or be DEI at a woke bank. I’ve seen some truly mediocre people ride coattails to director, and sometimes even to junior MD.
Lol no.
The normal analyst who doesn’t make mistakes is top bucket. Not the super social guy who messes up constantly and is always suggesting happy hours.
That’s why I said you need to be good enough… being bad at the job and a cool guy won’t cut it but you can’t be a combative dick analyst either, no matter how good you are. I’m giving a good rating to the solid performer who is likable and doesn’t piss me off over the “superstar” who pushes back on every ask.
Being reliable and responsive are the biggest factors as an incoming analyst. When you first hit the desk, no one expects you to be top bucket material as you are still ramping up and learning. However, if you are someone who puts out good work product, learns quickly, communicates about everything and is responsive, your asos and VPs will notice and your rep will eventually be recognized by seniors (at least in my bank). Have a good attitude, make it easy for your aso to check your work so eventually they trust you. Also, always be as accurate as possible and if you aren’t sure about something, just flag it. Not worth the hassle to explain how you came up with some obscure number that’s on the page. The other skill that no one talks about is being easy to work with. What I mean by that is you follow your deal team’s directions and if you think something should be done different, bring it up as an option but don’t be combative. It doesn’t matter if you are the best analyst but if you are an asshole and hard to work with, people will consider that when your reviews come up. Just my two cents, hope this helps.
Rerum veritatis nihil voluptate vitae. Quisquam quidem veritatis voluptatem id vel iusto recusandae. Assumenda repudiandae molestiae ratione deleniti.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...