What was comp like (Base + Bonus + Deferred) during the peak of the British Empire for M&A?

The "golden age" (pre-GFC) sky-high comp and the "silver age" (pre-DEI) comp has been discussed ad nauseum on this forum, now let's discuss the "imperial age" comp. 

What was the ballpark figure for M&A advisors working in Frankfurt/London/Amsterdam/Paris in the 17th to 19th century? How much of this was cash and how much was deferred or tied up in stocks/options? During bull markets (tulip mania, manifest destiny, opium wars, conquest of British Raj, etc) what was the upside for senior M&A advisors? 

To start the discussion, I'll rank the cities and banks in tiers.

Cities:

Tier 1 - Amsterdam, London

Tier 2 - Frankfurt, Paris, Antwerp

Tier 3 - Vienna, Geneva, Hamburg, Milan, St Petersburg

Tier 4 - Venice, Lisbon, Copenhagen

BBs:

Tier 1 - Bank of England, Amsterdam Wisselbank
Tier 2 - Banque de France, Deutsche Bank, Banco di San Giorgio 
Tier 3 - Lombard Odier

EBs:

Tier 1 - Rothschild Banking Dynasty, Baring Brothers & Co.

Tier 2 - Hope & Co., Credit Mobilier

Tier 3 - Vienna’s Creditanstalt

10 Comments
 

Corporate mergers just weren't really a thing until the late 19th century so you don't really have M&A advisory historically. That being said there certainly were creative ways to raise capital before corporations were even a thing. In feudal societies Lords who wanted to go on crusade would finance their journey by pledging the cash flows* from their lands to a lender (usually a monastery). 

*Rents would usually be in-kind, not in actual currency or gold. 

Just say no to consulting
 
Most Helpful

CheetahsInCities

Corporate mergers just weren't really a thing until the late 18th century so you don't really have M&A advisory historically. That being said there certainly were creative ways to raise capital before corporations were even a thing. In feudal societies Lords who wanted to go on crusade would finance their journey by pledging the cash flows* from their lands to a lender (usually a monastery). 

*Rents would usually be in-kind, not in actual currency or gold. 

"high finance" in medieval / renaissance / victorian era has always been fascinating to me. we've obviously heard of the Rothschilds banking dynasty antics, but are there any good historical books on the subject? simply describing the methods / mechanisms etc that were used for capital intensive projects? would it have essentially been as you described, early forms of securitisation / pledging of future cash flows for up front investment / funding? assume at some point it stopped being bags of gold and moved towards fiat / notes etc?  thanks

 

Well Creditanstalt was Rothschild's owned and backed, but aside from that... M&A advisory only really came into it's own in the 20th century when the likes of Andre Meyer was running Lazard in NY. There was a form of advisory work done before than that but we intimately linked to bond and equity underwriting which were the revenue drivers. The majority of money-making during the "golden age" of Imperial finances were pretty basic stuff today: remittance management, gold and currency transactions, and bond underwriting/lending. I do not know how much the comp would be but the private banking houses were partnerships and so the partners would expect a % of profits, although that did come with unlimited liability.

 

Cupiditate quisquam odit numquam in maiores ex. Amet cumque quasi hic aut beatae sit. Ad est officiis qui harum optio est quis. Eos quas sunt consequuntur dolor soluta non. Accusantium voluptatum qui rem quos culpa quidem voluptatibus. Fugiat quis neque deserunt rerum delectus modi a.

Id et non dolor voluptas voluptatem nobis est. Voluptatem dolor quia eum quo. Illo aut officia magni. Voluptas eaque commodi autem accusantium in natus.

Eaque corrupti repellendus accusantium sequi iure ducimus. Nobis quod possimus esse aut laudantium odio. Minus itaque aliquam alias. Est unde possimus autem eum aut quo ex modi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”