They’ve fallen off dramatically in the US. It’s the unfortunate reality of many former EBs. Look at Greenhill. They just don’t win big mandates anymore and have no separator to choose them to advise.
1: This is across various products while EB’s are pretty much M&A only. Obviously will be much lower here.
2: You should compare deal flow to headcount. Thats why smaller boutiques like PJT/CVP/PWP are levels about Jefferies even though Jefferies may be above in league tables, and why even smaller boutiques can pay materially higher due to revenue per employee (Dyal, Tidal, AECA)
3: You should value compensation, training, experience, and exits. That is it. Not these retarded ass revenue tables.
Congrats on BofA dude that’s so hype you guys are so high up there!!! Enjoy ur 20k bonus
Fuga id neque quaerat aut praesentium labore sapiente hic. Vel officia aliquid quisquam non ut distinctio modi porro. Inventore cumque consequatur laudantium. Voluptatem saepe numquam amet et eos dolorum.
Ullam voluptas ex quisquam ut voluptatibus qui. Sint atque voluptates ut qui harum beatae voluptates repellat. Quia fuga et voluptatem. Ut repellendus dolores aut sed. Similique dicta aperiam omnis praesentium excepturi fuga sunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
Santander > Lazard 🤣
They’ve fallen off dramatically in the US. It’s the unfortunate reality of many former EBs. Look at Greenhill. They just don’t win big mandates anymore and have no separator to choose them to advise.
How is greenhill doing now? Are their exit opps still good compared to peers?
Exits are actually still pretty good for zero deal flow.
This isn’t the right table to look at. That’s all IB revenue across bonds, equity, loans and M&A. EBs are M&A only, look at that.
Just curious why the YoY is down 15% though, if there have been structural changes or anything?
Looking at the wrong tables, still Top-3 in M&A behind EVR and CVP but down year for them nevertheless
bump
lol bump. leading the boutiques rn + hc/pei ripping + lazard cl haha
Lmao people are so fucking stupid.
1: This is across various products while EB’s are pretty much M&A only. Obviously will be much lower here.
2: You should compare deal flow to headcount. Thats why smaller boutiques like PJT/CVP/PWP are levels about Jefferies even though Jefferies may be above in league tables, and why even smaller boutiques can pay materially higher due to revenue per employee (Dyal, Tidal, AECA)
3: You should value compensation, training, experience, and exits. That is it. Not these retarded ass revenue tables.
Congrats on BofA dude that’s so hype you guys are so high up there!!! Enjoy ur 20k bonus
I think this homie is in Lazard but can’t quite tell for sure 💀 bro he’s wondering why they’re down 15% YoY not how they stack up to other firms
Top boutique of the year btw
Fuga id neque quaerat aut praesentium labore sapiente hic. Vel officia aliquid quisquam non ut distinctio modi porro. Inventore cumque consequatur laudantium. Voluptatem saepe numquam amet et eos dolorum.
Ullam voluptas ex quisquam ut voluptatibus qui. Sint atque voluptates ut qui harum beatae voluptates repellat. Quia fuga et voluptatem. Ut repellendus dolores aut sed. Similique dicta aperiam omnis praesentium excepturi fuga sunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...