Working Capital Question

Hi all,

Wanted to ask a question to see if I can get my head around something:

When it comes to Working Capital, why does this impact the cashflow statement? See below for my thoughts

  • If we had a 30 day delay for revenues and a 30 day pay-ahead for opex, when we model the cashflow statement (say as a quarterly model), we still include the full revenue figure in that period at the top of our statement (and the same for opex).
  • The working capital calculation then takes account any delays/pay forwards and then we take the net change to get the cash impact.
  • Is this in an effort to reflect these payment timelines? Ie is this is the point of the change in NWC that impacts the cashflows directly which we include in our model? Because in a scenario where 1 quarter had 0 delays or pay forwards, we would not have any change in WC and the result would be 0 for NWC.

Is my logic above correct?

Many thanks!

2 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's what you need to know:

Impact of Working Capital on Cash Flow Statement

  1. Revenue and Opex Inclusion:

    • When modeling the cash flow statement, you include the full revenue and operating expenses (opex) figures for the period at the top of the statement.
  2. Working Capital Calculation:

    • The working capital calculation accounts for any delays in revenue collection and prepayments for operating expenses.
    • This calculation helps to determine the net change in working capital (NWC), which directly impacts the cash flow.
  3. Reflecting Payment Timelines:

    • The purpose of including changes in NWC in the cash flow statement is to reflect the actual payment timelines.
    • For example, if there is a 30-day delay in revenue collection and a 30-day prepayment for opex, these timing differences are captured in the NWC calculation.
  4. Cash Impact:

    • The net change in NWC is taken to get the cash impact. This is crucial because it adjusts the cash flow to reflect the timing of cash inflows and outflows.
    • If there are no delays or prepayments in a given quarter, the change in NWC would be zero, resulting in no impact on the cash flow from operations (CFO).

Example from WSO Content

  • Deferred Revenue:

    • Deferred revenue, which is a liability, can show up as negative net working capital. This is actually a good sign as it indicates customers are paying in advance.
    • As deferred revenue increases, it adds to the cash flow, reflecting the prepayment by customers.
  • Net Operating Working Capital:

    • For cash flow purposes, net operating working capital is calculated as all current assets (excluding cash) minus all current liabilities (excluding debt).
    • This focuses on the operational aspects of the business, not the financial side.

Conclusion

Your logic is correct. The change in NWC impacts the cash flow statement to reflect the timing of cash inflows and outflows due to delays in revenue collection and prepayments for expenses. This adjustment ensures that the cash flow statement accurately represents the company's cash position.

For more detailed discussions and examples, you can refer to the WSO threads and resources on working capital and cash flow modeling.

Sources: Working Capital considerations in LBO, DCF Modeling Course ~ Pre-training text.pdf, EBITDA vs. Operating Cash Flow vs. Free Cash Flow, Levered vs. Unlevered Free Cash Flow Difference, Investment Banking Interview Questions - 15 Answers to Land the Job

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Voluptatem neque est voluptatibus. Debitis aut quia accusamus voluptatibus aut rem quos. Eaque ut repudiandae voluptas aut laborum sunt sed amet. Quas aliquam odit qui. Quibusdam cum odit nobis beatae at ipsam tempore culpa.

Quo voluptate veniam molestiae nesciunt dolores et soluta. Voluptas et saepe minima asperiores qui in. Consequuntur non itaque nam debitis consequatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”