Am I chasing something not right for me?

Hi guys, i’ve been grappling with something recently and I need some advice. My background is in VC and startups with a lot of overall experience in finance but never went down the IB path. I’m a lot more entrepreneurial than most people on this website but also much more inept at traditional financial skills such as modeling since most of my experience is around sourcing, partnerships, and IR. I understand financial concepts very well and can analyze a company but never got any work opportunities to learn to model. So i’m wondering is it even worth chasing this type of role if the traditional finance path is not my end goal?

At the moment, i’m an entrepreneur building a business that has a lot of potential while also trying to recruit for a full time role. My thought process is that I can always leave the corporate world to start a company, but getting back in is harder. I’ve gotten looks in PE on the BD side but am wondering whether I would learn anything new at all considering it’s very similar to my previous role. I’d never want to stay in PE long term anyway and would only want to get learn the playbook (so I can buy a business in the future) and get good exit opps. Does that happen on the BD side?

As I mentioned, finance is not my end goal and I see myself more as an operator doing strategy and entrepreneurial. The only exception would be if I have an opportunity to go back into VC at some point down the road as a principal/partner. Other than that, I’ve always been wanting to do a top MBA and get brand name exposure in MBB, unicorn startup, or similar which i’m currently missing. Basically my goal is the learn as many skills as possible, build my network, and stack up capital so I can be a great business leader in the future. What are your thoughts and suggestions?

3 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, your situation reflects a common crossroads for entrepreneurial individuals with a finance background but without traditional IB or modeling experience. Here are some tailored insights and suggestions:

1. Chasing PE for the Playbook and Exit Opportunities

  • BD Side in PE: While business development (BD) roles in PE can provide exposure to deal sourcing and partnerships, they may not offer the deep operational or financial modeling skills you're seeking. If your goal is to learn the "playbook" for buying and growing businesses, you might find the learning curve limited on the BD side, as it often overlaps with your existing skill set.
  • Exit Opportunities: Transitioning from a BD role in PE to other areas like VC or entrepreneurship is possible, but it may not significantly enhance your technical or operational expertise. If you're looking to build skills for future business leadership, consider roles that challenge you in areas where you're less experienced.

2. Balancing Entrepreneurship and Corporate Roles

  • Entrepreneurial Path: If your current business has strong potential, it might be worth focusing on scaling it. Many successful entrepreneurs leverage their ventures to build networks, capital, and credibility, which can later open doors to VC or other strategic roles.
  • Corporate Re-entry: Your concern about re-entering the corporate world is valid, but it's not insurmountable. If you decide to pursue a corporate role, prioritize positions that align with your long-term goals, such as strategy, operations, or roles that expose you to financial modeling and deal execution.

3. MBA and Brand Name Exposure

  • Top MBA: Pursuing a top MBA can be a game-changer for building your network, gaining brand name exposure, and pivoting into roles like MBB consulting, unicorn startups, or VC. It can also help you address gaps in your technical skills through coursework and internships.
  • Timing: If an MBA is a priority, consider whether your current entrepreneurial venture or a short stint in a strategic role could strengthen your application. Admissions committees value unique, impactful experiences.

4. Alternative Paths to Skill Building

  • Corporate Development: A corporate development role at a fast-growing startup or established company could provide exposure to M&A, strategy, and financial modeling, aligning with your goals of learning and network building.
  • VC or Growth Equity: If VC is a long-term aspiration, consider roles that bridge your entrepreneurial and financial experience, such as growth equity or operational roles at portfolio companies.
  • Self-Learning: If modeling is a gap, you can address it through resources like WSO's financial modeling courses, which are designed for professionals transitioning into finance-heavy roles.

5. Strategic Decision-Making

  • Focus on Long-Term Goals: Since finance is not your end goal, prioritize roles and experiences that align with your vision of becoming a business leader. This might mean stepping away from traditional finance paths and doubling down on entrepreneurial or operational opportunities.
  • Leverage Your Strengths: Your entrepreneurial mindset, sourcing, and partnership skills are valuable in VC, startups, and strategy roles. Use these strengths to differentiate yourself while addressing technical gaps.

Final Thoughts:

Your instincts about not staying in PE long-term and focusing on broader leadership skills are spot on. If you decide to pursue a corporate role, ensure it offers new learning opportunities and aligns with your long-term vision. Alternatively, scaling your current business or pursuing an MBA could be more impactful for achieving your goals.

Sources: Is BCG a viable path to Private Equity?, What is the point of doing private equity if you will be pushed out after two years to get an MBA?, HF to PE post-MBA - my story and seeking advice (long-time poster)!, Staying a third year as a PE associate vs. doing something nontraditional, Corporate Development Manager - Q&A

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

You’re just doing things in the wrong order, but IMO you’re better off trying to get a strategy/ops/strategic finance role at an established startup (ideally series C and above, but not publicly traded)

Most people go IB > VC or PE (which is an unnecessary step but takes some soul searching to get there if you ultimately want to be a business leader) > exit to a scaled startup/public co in some finance function that interacts with the c suite > move earlier and earlier stage to take on more operating responsibilities (I.e. employ the operating playbooks you learned from the company that figured that out already) as a soft launch of being a business leader > start their own thing

I think you need to do some soul searching about what type of business you think you have the right to create, with no real tangible corporate skill you’re developing (in the sense of you can’t CODE (CTO), you can’t SELL (CEO/CRO) - and no being a guy who knows what GTM motions are means you can sell, you can’t do real FINANCE (CFO) from accounting, accounting operations, to corporate finance, investing - all real skills beyond modeling etc. you know how to report to a board and pattern match, but you have no real operating skill yet. So you’re a wannabe entrepreneur to solve…what problem exactly? Ok how will your professional background specifically make you a domain expert to make this work?

None of this meant to be disparaging - it’s just I think you should figure a real tangible skill to spike in, develop some specific spike of industry expertise and try to identify problems you see on the ground. Go to a company and fix those problems, that’s the best “corporate sponsored” path way to try to be a successful entrepreneur, but still it’s extraordinary hard after that too.

 

Ea et aut nulla qui sed suscipit iusto. Voluptate accusamus iste minus maxime repudiandae nesciunt. Facere dolorem adipisci quaerat aut quo aut debitis. Vitae tempore dolor ipsam repellendus fuga. Aut aut et suscipit ut nam ut.

Quidem in perferendis soluta voluptas iste ab. Libero quam officiis pariatur incidunt doloremque rem impedit. Voluptates repellat consectetur exercitationem ratione culpa in ea. Ad sed veritatis aliquid sed dolorem.

Dolorum odio ab rerum ea mollitia amet unde doloremque. Expedita aperiam eum nihil velit ea maiores ipsam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (68) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”