Big 4 FDD vs Audit
Hello everybody,
I am struggling with a dilemma which I can't seem to answer for myself.
So any input you guys have is welcomed.
Some background:
I am currently working in the Netherlands at a Big 4 office. So far I have worked at audit and Transaction Services/Financial Due Dilligence departments. I am 1 year away from finishing the theoretical phase of the Chartered Accountant qualification (however I still need 3-year experience before I will achieve the CA qualification)
I will have to make a choice soon on which department I want to continue my career at this Big 4.
I enjoyed the work at both departments. Both departments have their pro's and con's. Audit has slightly better work/life balance (overtime is paid), while TS has a higher base salary + bonus. At the end of the ride, I think both will have the same average hourly rate.
Work durign busy seasons is though, but challenging. Deal-based work hours is hectic but rewarding.
My focus however is on the future. If I want to join a PE-house, the choice is of course obviously FDD.
However, what would you recommend someone who is working towards a C-suite job (CFO) in the future?
Audit or FDD?
Also keep in mind that if I choose FDD i will have to forsake the CA title (which is highly respected in the Netherlands). However, I do have the opportunity to gain the executive master of Finance & Control at FDD.
So, if you were in my situation, what do you do?
Go.
Why would you have to give up your CA?
It's not that I want to, but if I choose for the Financial Due Dilligence department there is no possibility for the 3-year audit work experience (which is required under dutch law).
Similique qui et enim temporibus in. Odit sit vel magnam minima. Quis amet consequuntur esse.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...