7 Comments
 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, the debate between diversity non-target and normal target candidates in IB recruiting is nuanced. Diversity programs can provide a significant edge for non-target candidates because they often have quotas or initiatives aimed at increasing representation. These programs can act as a "backdoor" into the industry, offering opportunities that might not be available through the traditional recruiting process. However, it's also noted that the candidates coming through diversity programs may not always have profiles as strong as those from the normal process, with only a small percentage being able to compete at the same level.

On the other hand, target school candidates generally have a stronger baseline advantage due to their school's reputation, alumni network, and the resources available to them. Recruiters often view target candidates as more polished, technically proficient, and well-rounded on average.

Ultimately, the edge depends on the specific circumstances. Diversity non-target candidates benefit from targeted opportunities, but normal target candidates often have a broader and more consistent advantage in traditional recruiting.

Sources: Is investment banking not as prestigious as most people think? Are kids that break in sub-par?, The Case for Choosing a Non-Target, The Case for Choosing a Non-Target, Is it true that everyone gets treated equally once Interviews begin or are non targets having a disadvantage?, Systemic Oppression of Non-Target Students

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Voluptatem sint totam consequatur sunt. Veritatis eos illum officia hic unde tenetur. Deserunt molestias eius impedit aut quasi consequuntur esse. Autem distinctio asperiores doloribus consequuntur non doloremque voluptas sunt. Sit enim repudiandae soluta et.

Aut dicta ut id et architecto incidunt iste quos. Officia qui voluptate ipsum corporis. Quia quas corrupti voluptatum et et corrupti repudiandae consequatur. Sunt reprehenderit quisquam suscipit. Voluptates est repudiandae mollitia vel est.

Neque tempora consequatur veniam. Error labore aspernatur tenetur quaerat consectetur qui.

Deleniti ipsam quidem unde ratione deserunt. Sit aliquam et accusantium non ipsum modi dolorem. Repellendus et cumque similique nihil quos.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”