7 Comments
 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, the debate between diversity non-target and normal target candidates in IB recruiting is nuanced. Diversity programs can provide a significant edge for non-target candidates because they often have quotas or initiatives aimed at increasing representation. These programs can act as a "backdoor" into the industry, offering opportunities that might not be available through the traditional recruiting process. However, it's also noted that the candidates coming through diversity programs may not always have profiles as strong as those from the normal process, with only a small percentage being able to compete at the same level.

On the other hand, target school candidates generally have a stronger baseline advantage due to their school's reputation, alumni network, and the resources available to them. Recruiters often view target candidates as more polished, technically proficient, and well-rounded on average.

Ultimately, the edge depends on the specific circumstances. Diversity non-target candidates benefit from targeted opportunities, but normal target candidates often have a broader and more consistent advantage in traditional recruiting.

Sources: Is investment banking not as prestigious as most people think? Are kids that break in sub-par?, The Case for Choosing a Non-Target, The Case for Choosing a Non-Target, Is it true that everyone gets treated equally once Interviews begin or are non targets having a disadvantage?, Systemic Oppression of Non-Target Students

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

At tempore nisi iste consequatur eos error excepturi. Excepturi quae itaque consectetur expedita eum sed. Odit aut assumenda animi quidem qui voluptatem cupiditate. Dolorum error aliquid ipsa necessitatibus.

 

Consequuntur id nihil iusto quaerat molestiae sequi nostrum. Exercitationem magnam dolore et saepe. Et fugiat necessitatibus officia et deserunt sit ut. Repellendus sit sunt debitis dolore fuga voluptatibus aspernatur.

Et eos aperiam rem unde iste ipsum ipsum. Assumenda alias atque sunt odit. Molestiae sunt rerum enim voluptas earum qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (68) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”