18 Comments
 

chumpchimp

Influencers drive consumption, if they didn't companies would not pay them to endorse products. Consumption is good for the economy because it encourages more production which increases the country's GDP.

They are not responsible for a net increase in consumption though. Its just a case of consumption moving from one marketing channel to another - old style TV/newspapers to new style social media influencers. If it wasn't being done through influencers it would be done through something else.

Personally I look forward to this influencer phase of society being over. Just hope its not replaced with something worse.

 
chumpchimp

Influencers drive consumption, if they didn't companies would not pay them to endorse products. Consumption is good for the economy because it encourages more production which increases the country's GDP.

Bingo 

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
 

Define influencers, if you wanna learn or improve a skill, from bodybuilding to python, you can find some expert to help on youtube and stuff.

If we are talking about tick tockers or instagram douchebags popping bottles and acting like they are the shit without ever doing something of any meaning, its a big negative.

 
Most Helpful

Idk I might be looking back to the pre-Instagram and TikTok days with rose-colored glasses, but I would say net positive before Instagram and TikTok (and maybe throw in Vine too, as the original TikTok before TikTok) because the main "influencers" prior to that were generally making longer-form content that you generally sought out to learn about a specific niche topic that in the past, you'd be harder pressed to find online.  And with longer-form media, it's generally less about instant gratification.

All these reels / clips / etc. have really made it a strong net negative because now it's all about stupid dances, instant gratification, and chasing clout.

 

If people are making educational content and are qualified in one form or another to speak on the topic (it's their job, formal education on the topic, etc.) or their content is at least entertaining then I would say it's a net positive, but some of the fitness influencers and the like out there peddling bro science so they can sell their supplements are definitely a net negative. It's kinda like when interns and prospects chime in on WSO for topics they aren't even remotely qualified to address and give terrible advice to someone with a genuine question.

 

Molestias expedita rerum soluta nostrum nostrum. Laborum dolores placeat veniam rerum. Voluptas officiis totam velit earum maiores eligendi dolore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (50) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”